Marquette Free Speech Outrage and the Upcoming AHA Resolution on Speech Codes
As Anthony Gregory discussed here earlier, the philosophy department chair, James South, removed a note from the office door of Stuart Ditsler, a graduate student teaching assistant. The note, which South deemed"patently offensive," stated:
As Americans we must always remember that we all have a common enemy, an enemy that is dangerous, powerful, and relentless. I refer, of course, to the federal government.
Ditsler complained to (who else?) the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) that Marquette had violated his academic freedom. Ralph Luker has done yeoman work in publicizing the story.
In an email to department members, South elaborated on the basis for his decision:
"I'm afraid that hallways and office doors are not 'free-speech zones. If material is patently offensive and has no obvious academic import or university sanction, I have little choice but to take note."
South’s timing was impeccable. Unwittingly, he has given new momentum to the movement for the AHA resolution. To vote, paid-up members (faculty or students) need to show up at the AHA business on Saturday, January 6, 2007 at 4:45 p.m. in the Fulton/Cobb Room at the Atlanta Hilton:
RESOLUTION ON SPEECH CODES AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM
Whereas, The American Historical Association has already gone on record against the threat to academic freedom posed by the Academic Bill of Rights; and
Whereas, Free and open discourse is essential to the success of research and learning on campus; and
Whereas, Administrators and others have used campus speech codes and associated non-academic criteria to improperly restrict faculty choices on curriculum, course content, and personnel decisions; and
Whereas, Administrators and others have also used speech codes to restrict free and open discourse for students and faculty alike through such methods as"free speech zones" and censorship of campus publications; therefore be it
Resolved, The American Historical Association opposes the use of speech codes to restrict academic freedom.
comments powered by Disqus
- Hillary Clinton’s 3 debate performances left the Trump campaign in ruins
- Now Austria Says It Will Likely Redesign Hitler's House, Not Tear It Down
- Some looted Idlib National Museum artifacts resurface, fate of others a mystery amidst ‘thriving black market trade’
- Is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau constitutional?
- Poll: Millennials desperately need to bone up on the history of communism
- Does the 'Father' of the 1948 Ethnic Cleansing Narrative Really Want to Recant His Words?
- Max Boot wants to know “what the hell happened to my Republican Party?"
- Conservative historians against Trump sign a petition warning he'd be dangerous
- Benjamin H. Irvin Named OAH Executive Editor
- Historian Diana Ramey Berry praises effort to return the skull of Nat Turner to his family