A Chronicle articlereported yesterday that, at a conference Friday, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales warned college students not to use the free online encyclopedia as a primary resource for research. Wales discussed the emails he receives from distraught college students about their low marks due to inaccurate information on Wikipedia. Among other things, Mr. Wales and his cohort have thought about composing a “fact sheet” to give professors about the uses and misuses of Wikipedia. But shouldn’t we have this kind of “sheet” already? Shouldn’t professors already be teaching students how to critically evaluate sources, on the web and in print?
I’m teaching a section of History 120 (introduction to US history) at George Mason University this fall, and one of my first lessons will discuss the strengths and weakness of digital resources such as Wikipedia. Historians cannot and should not simply ignore Wikipedia, as Roy Rosenzweig’s recent article “Can History Be Open Source?” in the Journal of American History reveals. With regard to our students, we need to do more than simply say “You cannot cite Wikipedia in your research papers,” or worse, say that students can only use one or two internet sources. Instead, we need to explain how to properly use Wikipedia, and other digital resources, to enhance learning and help develop critical thinking skills.
This latest article in the Chronicle, Dr. Rosenzweig’s JAH article, and the observations of a fewotherbloggers have made me think about how best to present Wikipedia to my students this fall. So, this post is the first in a series about some thoughts I’ve had about using Wikipedia as a teaching tool. The next few articles will discuss, respectively:
- Anatomy of a Wikipedia article
- Discussions on Wikipedia Articles
- Histories of Articles
- Comparing Wikipedia to Printed Sources
comments powered by Disqus
David Davisson - 6/16/2006
For several reasons I don't have access to the new issue of JAH either in print or online. I probably won't have access until the middle of August at the earliest. Is anyone aware of a copy online and not behind a wall?
Jeremy Boggs - 6/16/2006
I don't mind at all!
Jeremy Boggs - 6/16/2006
Heh, this is funny. Thanks, Josh, and Finn!
Josh Greenberg - 6/15/2006
Funny - those are notes from a presentation I just gave two days ago. I'll have the slides up online later this week...
David Davisson - 6/14/2006
Here is an outline of scholarly collaboration that might be of interest.
Finn Arne Jorgensen
Ms. Cornelius - 6/13/2006
I will be looking forward to the next posts. I hope you doon't mind if I use them in my high school classes.
Jeremy Boggs - 6/13/2006
Agreed. I'm researching the idea now, and will gladly welcome suggestions from others, especially from folks who have engaged students in a critical evaluation of Wikipedia.
Manan Ahmed - 6/13/2006
This is quite timely and needed. I think that if we can hash up a "How/When to read/cite Wikipedia" cheatsheet to use in class syllabi, it would find wide circulation.
Looking forward to the rest.
- Frontline does Trump & Clinton
- This New York Times ‘Hitler’ book review sure reads like a thinly veiled Trump comparison
- Chicago Tribune editorial: The government should release secret grand jury testimony about its 1942 scoop: "Jap Plan to Strike at Sea"
- US owes blacks reparations over slavery: UN experts
- Mali Islamist jailed for nine years for Timbuktu shrine attacks
- What Historians Are Saying About the First Trump-Clinton Debate
- Princeton professor documents the movement that ended single-sex education at elite schools
- Annette Gordon-Reed tells historians the controversy over Harvard law school's shield is different from the fight over the Confederate flag
- Historian EP Thompson denounced Communist party chiefs, files show
- Voting opens soon for the leaders of the OAH in 2017