Mar 24, 2006 5:38 pm


A couple of days ago I was watching France 2 news. One of the segments was introduced as demonstrating the difficulties of the poor in America. What was the problem? The poor cannot afford to retire. Amazingly, it gave as an example the heartwarming story of Arthur Winston, the feisty 100-year-old bus cleaner. The story itself made it clear that Arthur loved his job and refused to retire:

He said he had seen generations of co-workers come and go but he never felt he was missing out on a"gentle retirement".

"I just kept on going. I'd rather be moving, working or doing something than laying around the house," he said.

My husband and I looked at each other in astonishment and then shrugged the story off as another example of French TV trying to convince its own people in the mendacity of the American economic system.

The following illustrates the way this counter productive attitude not only permeates the entire EU mode of thought but leads respected academics to conclude that Czech Republic has the lowest poverty levels in EU.

Europe and Poverty: what is the real situation? by Sarah Bouquerel and Pierre-Alain de Malleray

Although there is still no common non-monetary index to gauge poverty within the European Union it is possible however to say that poverty is regressing long term in spite of disparities which remain major. Although we are far from having eradicated poverty it has diminished greatly. There are less poor people in the European Union today than in the 1970's.

In the social domain where competencies are still national the European Union has undeniably become aware of its role regarding poverty and exclusion. Making up for lost time on the part of regions that are lagging behind, the overall increase in wealth and the regression of poverty are the clearest evidence of this.

The European Council of Lisbon in March 2000 laid the foundations of convergence between Member States with regard to the fight against exclusion or, in european terms,"social inclusion". In 2001 during the European Council of Laeken the Heads of State and government approved the first set of 18 common statistical indicators as well as an"open co-ordination method" to circulate States' best practices in terms of poverty and social exclusion. In parallel to the traditional indicators to gauge monetary poverty structural indicators were also selected with regard to employment, healthcare and education. Since then the list has been added to and now includes around twenty indicators one of which refers to poor workers.

According to the definition decided upon in Laeken the countries of southern Europe (Portugal, Greece, Spain and Italy) and the Anglo-Saxon countries (UK and Ireland) generally reveal higher than average poverty levels. The Scandinavian countries traditionally produce better results whilst the large continental countries lie near the average scores. Of the ten new Member States the average monetary poverty level is close to that of the 15 other Member States. This result which is a priori surprising is simply the expression of the relativity of the notion of poverty which is defined by national systems of reference. Hence beyond all expectations the Czech Republic has the lowest poverty levels in the entire Union.

The authors: Sarah Bouquerel and Pierre-Alain de Malleray former students of the Ecole Polytechnique, executive civil servants and lecturers in economy at the Institut d'Etudes Politiques in Paris.

comments powered by Disqus