QUISLING REDUX/ UPDATES
Well, plus ça change. Following those infamous Danish cartoons of Muhammad, the Danish prime minister steadfastly refused to apologize of censuring the paper. Believe it or not but today the Saudi Arabia demonstrated that it does, indeed, support the Islamist agenda by recalling its ambassador from Denmark in protest.
Do not worry, the Saudi will not have to undertake the same action to insure Norwegian subservience. A small Norwegian Christian publication republished the cartoons in solidarity with its Danish brethren. The Norwegian government instructed its embassies in Muslim countries"to voice their regret" for the publication. A thrilled Malaysian paper reported: Mohammad cartoons force Norway to advise embassies. Norwegians must be proud.
Unfortunately, the Norwegian government is not alone. UN, EU and, even Danish professional associations have failed to back the freedom of expression of the provocative Danish editors or even go as far as steadfastly condemn the death threats emanating from Pakistani Islamists.
Writing for the Pakistani paper The Daily TimesMiranda Hussain complains:
When Muslims adopt the Old Testament prescription of an eye for an eye and respond to cartoons of Prophet Muhammad by producing a cartoon of the Virgin Mary with naked breasts one loses sight of the blasphemer and the blasphemed against.When does blasphemy become blasphemous? Can only believers be guilty of blasphemy against a particular religion? Or can non-believers also be hauled before the dock?
Of course, the sly attribution of an"eye for an eye" to the Old Testament, is nothing but a way to discredit the idea by attributing it to the Jewish holy book. Miranda may not know that while in Judaism the idea has not been taken literally (if ever) at least since the first century. It is still part of the Muslim Sharia and it is currently invoked in Saudi Arabia.
Be that as it may, her questions are valid. May I suggest that Muslims follow the practice of Jews and Christians and let God take care of Himself?
UPDATE -
I have received two communications from Denmark. My first correspondent worries:
There was a great scandal in Norway yesterday: a leading newspaper got hold of a document in which the Norwegian government apologized for Expressens reprint of our drawings, i.e. the demanded excuse that they of course couldn't give openly without contradicting Norwegian law, since Expressen had not broken any. Then it is a dubious act for a government to regret this no-offence.But they hoped that Norwegian exports wouldn't be threatened with this secret apology. Naively they didn't realize, that those documents always come into the open.
Danish exports of dairy products to the Middle East are worth 3 bio. kroner each year (1 dollar: 5 kroner), the massive boycott, that now is on it's way, will probably cost thousands of Danes their jobs. Maybe this will swing the public opinion.
The second was much more optimistic:
Remember how thrilled I was when we won the elections in 2001? Anders Fogh Rasmussen is the best Prime Minister Denmark has ever had. And the good news is all the polls indicate he will slide to reelection in 2008/2009, because the new chairman of the Social Democrats does not have a clue. His agenda consists of 3 issues:1. No new taxes.
2. Immigrants must be willing to work, or they get no unemployment benefits and no citizenship.
3. A pro-American and pro-Israeli foreign policy.
We shall see but according to Islamonline Muslims Up Ante Against Denmark, Norway over Cartoons.
Professor John C. Zimmerman adds these cogent points:
I wonder whether the Danes demanded that the Saudis apologize for the anti - Christian hatred appearing in their textbooks or even made this an issue. They should have, and anyone who has access to the Danish press should make this point. The documentation on this appeared in academic articles in the"Middle East Journal" (Spring 2003) the British journal"International Affairs" (January 2003) and the comprehensive 95 page report which may be found at http://www.freedomhouse.org/religion (scroll down to the bottom of the page for the link.) entitled"Saudi Publications on Hate Ideology Fill American Mosques."What is happening to the Danes is extremely critical and may have more profound implications than what happened in France several months ago. It is often overlooked that Denmark had its own riots at the same time as France. The Muslim countries have chosen Denmark because it is small and can be"muscled." This is obvious because there are a great many anti Islamic websites and publications that come out of the US which have launched much worse attacks on the Prophet Muhammad than anything published in Denmark. Yet, we don't see Muslim demanding US government leaders and publications to apologize. For example, after 9/11 one Christian leader made a very serious attack on the personal morals and character of Muhammad, and many US online and hardcover publications make similar accusations. With a growing and resentful Muslim population in small Denmark, we are seeing the strongest attempt to date to Islamize speech in a non - Muslim country. Once Islamists succeed there, they will be able to branch out. But for now Denmark, because of its small size, is the logical testing ground for the Islamists.