comments powered by Disqus
Jonathan Dresner - 11/22/2005
Pribbenow's article is detailed and interesting in itself, but the interrogation theory which informs it is too deeply implicit for an amateur like myself to get a lot of useful (in the sense of evaluating policy: I'm not planning on interrogating anyone! I just give them pop quizzes....) information.
It is clear that the physical and most of the mental/emotional torture inflicted had little useful result.
And it's a fascinating "slice of life" of the Vietnam war: anyone teaching the conflict should consider this as a reading for students, I think.
- New book says amount of mustard gas exposure in World War II may be higher than acknowledged by government
- Canada’s Secret to Resisting the West’s Populist Wave
- Trump’s travel ban is built on a law meant to ‘protect’ the U.S. from Jews and communists
- The Time to Retrieve Time’s Time Capsule Is at Hand
- Manassas church opens restored slave cabin to the public
- John B. Boles wants students to know more about Jefferson than that he was a slaveholder
- Historian Daniel K. Williams says Democrats have a religion problem
- Bill O’Reilly – America’s best-selling “historian” – ridiculed in Harper’s for writing bad history
- Largest history festival is the UK criticized for being white and male
- Eric Foner doesn’t think much of a book that claims Lincoln moved slowly to emancipate blacks because he was a racist