That does not mean dissent should be outlawed or squashed just that it should be constructive and carefully timed.
Examination of past errors should await the end of the war and criticism should be directed at future improvement. Persons of honor should never forget that lives are at stake.
comments powered by Disqus
Jonathan Dresner - 11/12/2005
Brilliant piece. It frames the issue in the favor of pro-war arguments by ignoring entirely, as do you, the possibility that the critics are right, and that issues of tactics and causes are often intertwined and that radical, not incremental, alterations of policy may be necessary to avoid dramatic failure.
Propoganda. Cheap shots. Persons of honor would remember that principles are at stake as well as lives.
- Snopes debunks slavery Internet meme
- Revamped Chinese History Journal Welcomes Hard-Line Writers
- Poll: 3 Out of 5 Texan Trump Supporters Want Secession if Hillary Clinton Is Elected
- The Psychiatric Question: Is It Fair to Analyze Donald Trump From Afar?
- Minorities still feel Eugene, Oregon’s historical link to the Ku Klux Klan
- Ernst Nolte, Historian Whose Views on Hitler Caused an Uproar, Dies at 93
- Japan should give formal apology for wartime aggression, says historian
- Kevin Baker says America needs to bring back political machines
- Covell Meyskens uses his blog to show what life was like under Mao. (Interview)