Blogs > Liberty and Power > Greetings, Liberty-Lovers & Power-Skeptics

Oct 13, 2005 6:03 pm


Greetings, Liberty-Lovers & Power-Skeptics



Greetings to all. David was nice enough to permit me to guest-blog for a bit over here. In my day-job, I'm an editorial writer for a fine New York newspaper that shall remain nameless.

In my"day-blog", I can be found over here at a little place called RAGGED THOTS, where I might be found ruminating"on politics, race, pop culture, sports, comic books & various other sundry temptations of the human condition." For more, see here.

As a further introduction, please check out the copy of my pre-election conscientious objector essay from a year ago on why I couldn't vote for Bush's re-election. In light of recent developments, I'm happy to say that it pretty much holds up. Qualms over civil liberties? spending? and the administration's inability to hold officials accountable for screw-ups? Yep, yep and yep.

Indeed, the"lack of accountability" aspect is a big problem. I am frankly less concerned about how a Justice Harriet Miers would rule on so-called"social issues." Wwhat gives me shudders is the now- preferred pro-Miers talking point is that she will essentially be a rubber-stamp for the executive branch.

How else should we read this characterization by RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman in a conference call with GOP-leaning bloggers?"Judicial activism is interfering with the GWOT by 'micromanaging' decisions. Miers will be solid on executive prerogative." (Admittedly, this is Steven Bainbridge's live-blogging of Mehlman's comments, but I have no reason to believe that they are being mischaracterized.)

Indoctrinating the"principles" of the GWOT onto the Supreme Court. Wonderful.

While we're on that topic -- this would be a good question to ask Miers in a possible confirmation hearing:"Miss Miers, do you believe the Court should"defer" to executive prerogative or -- in the words of now-Chief Justice Roberts -- do you believe that the Supreme Court should be like an 'umpire' and not play favorites?"

Everybody should pay attention to whatever her answer may be.




comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Jonathan Rick - 10/16/2005

Removed at request of the poster. 12-14-05.


Robert A. George - 10/14/2005

Or, you could have just clicked on "nameless." <g>


Jonathan Rick - 10/14/2005

Removed at request of the poster. 12-14-05


Kenneth R Gregg - 10/13/2005

And a hearty welcome to you, Robert! After about a month and a half of kidney problems (I won't bore you with the details), so am I.
Cheers to you,
Just Ken
kgregglv@cox.net

Subscribe to our mailing list