John Taylor Gatto: Against School
comments powered by Disqus
Anthony Gregory - 10/6/2005
Or, you can take the view that libertarianism is the real left, and that most self-described liberals and leftists are in fact middle-of-the-roaders, attempting to use conservative (statist) means to achieve libertarian ends.
After all, it was largely the rightwing that gave us the welfare state.
William J. Stepp - 10/6/2005
First, libertarians don't ignore the economic and cultural benefits of more widespread education. We just think these could be delivered better and more affordably with private schools, and without the statist indoctrination that comes with them.
Second, there is no contradiction between being against anti-leftist policies to the extent that they are anti-libertarian, and being against the core values of leftism, compulsary egalitarianism and economic intervention.
It's worth pointing out that historically the War Party has had plenty of leftists, and indeed the big wars the U.S. fought in during the 20th century happened during Democratic regimes.
It's also a myth that the left is consistently pro-civil liberties, as the history of the war on drugs shows.
Jonathan Dresner - 10/5/2005
The "history" of public education systems focuses entirely on (often only putative) politicization, ignoring the economic and cultural benefits of more widespread education. The "analysis" consists of a sort of "original sin" by which some of the initial "bad" views of early educators (and it always amuses me to find libertarians so unqualifiedly against anti-leftist policies, when they are so anti-left themselves) taints the entire world history of public education.
The solution is a combination of early "learn by doing, not by learning" pedagogy (Pestalozzi, among others; Rousseau was a proponent of this as well, if memory serves) and heroic individualism (Rand, of course; the use of exceptional cases to disprove an overwhelming average is characteristic of hard-core Randian writers).
Is that clearer?
Mark Brady - 10/5/2005
Jonathan Dresner - 10/5/2005
...the incessant conflation of "purposes" and "effects" this isn't much more than a sort of Pestalozzian Randism, is it?
- Rubio Surges Into Second In New Hampshire
- Branstad Says Cruz Ran ‘Unethical’ Campaign
- Christie Highlights Santorum’s Endorsement of Rubio
- Portman Comes Out Against Trade Deal
- Megyn Kelly Gets a Book Deal
- A Big List of the Bad Things Clinton Has Done
- An Unambiguous Sign Sanders Won Last Night’s Debate
- Still Friends at the End
- Quote of the Day
- Trump Still Leads as Clinton Slips
- Clinton Can’t Shake Image as Wall Street’s Friend
- Maddow Doesn’t See Sanders Winning
- Why Does the Media Still Shield Chelsea Clinton?
- Bush Jokes His Mother May Have Abused Him
- Rubio Closes the Gap in New Hampshire
- We asked 6 political scientists if Bernie Sanders would have a shot in a general election
- The price of oil has plummeted and with it Russia’s finances
- Legal scholars at Harvard debate Cruz’s eligibility to serve as president
- Has one of Sally Hemings’s siblings been neglected by history unfairly?
- Retired historian George Dennison remains on the payroll at the U. of Montana while faculty are cut
- The Atlantic profiles exciting ways to teach history
- LDS Church has gone from 0 to 4 historians specializing in women’s history
- Israeli historian Yair Auron lays out details of a massacre in 1948