On Getting Out of Iraq, II
From what we know (or at least from what I know) about the complex situation in Iraq, the war will not end or cannot be ended in the first way. Neither U.S. forces nor insurgent forces can decisively defeat the other in order to force it to surrender.
Can it end the second way? What would it take?
The most important determinant is the appreciation by decision makers on both sides that a condition of military deadlock has been reached, coupled with their judgments that the chances of favorably altering the military balance of power on the field of battle are slight or nonexistent, or that the effort will be too costly in relation to some standard of cost-effectiveness. In this instance, decision makers have decided that a compromise armistice will better serve their reduced aims, offer more hope of achieving their goals in the long run, or at least lessen the heavy human, material, and political costs of continued war.
It may all come to this, but it does not now appear that the players (the heterogeneous insurgents, the interim government, or the Bush administration) have yet reached this point. The moment might come, however, if and after the new constitution is adopted and elections are held. Bush might then, for example, adopt Nixon’s Vietnamization/decent-interval exit strategy, coupled with negotiations.
The third type of war ending seems unlikely, unless the warring parties agree to some sort of UN or international intervention.
Meanwhile, civil war looms.
comments powered by Disqus
Brian R Robertson - 8/25/2005
I don't think Dr. Kimball should blog in historical absolutes when comparing Bush's Iraq exit options to Nixon's supposed 'decent-interval'exit from the Vietnam War in 1973. There are a number of sources and archival evidence that contradict this interpretation. The 1972 claims of a spiteful campaign worker like Richard Whalen(who also claimed in 2004 that Bob Dole had assured him that the former senator was going to campaign for Kerry) and selective documents do not constitute the entire historical record.
John H. Lederer - 8/22/2005
The more common ending for a failed insurgency is for it to fade away.
The loss of the support of the populace for terrorism in Iraq suggests to me that this is the most likely ending there.
- Pittsburgh native David McCullough's next book will focus on generations of Northwest pioneers
- British historian Sheila Lecoeur is on trial for defamation
- Jim Downs laments that Americans still aren’t being taught LGBT history
- Historian Jeremy Kuzmarov calls on Obama to pardon Ethel Rosenberg
- Garry Wills says there’s one human test we can use to decide who’s the better candidate: Trump or Clinton