When Should a Tenured Professor Retire?
You do not have to register to participate in this poll for the first two weeks; after that, registration is required. We do ask all readers to abide by our civility guidelines whether they register or not.
To participate in our poll simply drop down to the bottom of this page and click on the word"Comments."
Food for Thought
You heard it here first: I will retire as a tenured professor no later than the spring of 2025. I will be 67....
Why go at 67? I believe that if senior scholars offer experience, young Ph.D.’s challenge us with new knowledge. Furthermore, while a classroom presence does not necessarily deteriorate with age, we don’t always notice, or want to admit it, when we become diminished. Setting a voluntary retirement date, well in advance of any decline, respects this reality.
First, the era has long passed in which a tenure-track faculty position automatically replaces a retired professor, as colleges instead opt for higher percentages of contingent faculty, who cost much less money. A handful of resource-starved public universities (CUNY, under the leadership of Chancellor Matthew Goldstein, comes to mind) have bucked the trend, but too often the real-world choice comes between classes taught by a longtime professor who has delayed retirement or by an adjunct, hired at the last minute without a competitive national search.
Second, and to a degree unprecedented in the history of American higher education, the contemporary academy has aggressively limited the number of topics to which students can be exposed. New faculty lines have been crafted to place an increasing number of research questions and pedagogical approaches off-limits.
comments powered by Disqus
Paul E Hoffman - 8/18/2010
Thanks to Claude Pepper faculty in public institutions no longer have to retire at 70, or 65. The question for anyone is whether teaching is still "fun," one can do it physically, and one is fairly certain that the students are being served (they will make it clear if they are not!). Secondarily in these fiscally troubled times, a consideration is supporting the "side," that is the department, which could loose the line, putting a heavier burden on younger faculty who remain and seriously disrupting programs, esp. at the graduate level. And of course one has to retire to something - perhaps writing those books that could not be completed due to a heavy teaching load or other responsibilities, or to travel. I certainly know a number of scholars whose output increased many times over once they were retired. I suspect that for a healthy person, the point of decision is somewhere in the early 70s. That's where I expect to make my own decision. Meanwhile, I enjoy what I do!
James Goodman - 8/18/2010
So complicated an issue, and so many differences between experiences of different people at different kinds of institutions. I'd love to set a retirement date, but I don't have the slightest idea when I'll be able to afford to retire, or if I'll ever be able to afford to retire. I live an extremely modest life in an extremely expensive city and teach at a public university in one of our financially failed states. I don't expect my salary is going to increase as fast as the cost of living in the sixteen years between now and my 70th birthday. My benefits are likely going to be reduced. And my state's contribution to my retirement is going to go down. When the time comes, I will do what some of my very productive and smart senior colleagues have done: refused to retire until the university agreed to hire a junior person in a tenure track line to replace them. But who knows if we'll continue to have that power.
So I might like to retire--or at least stop taking a full time salary--at a reasonable age, both to make room for the young and to devote myself to nothing but reading and writing. But whether I'll be in as good a position as Mark Taylor to do so I can't say. It shouldn't go without notice that Professor Taylor--a leading advocate of mandatory retirement--is both Emeritus Professor at Williams and Professor of Religion (and chair of the department) at Columbia. My guess is that his retirement at a reasonable age will be less complicated to arrange than mine.
- Killer took selfie after stabbing historian over rare ‘Wind in the Willows’ book
- VW fires corporate historian who drew attention to wartime ties to Nazis
- Trump Recording Narrows Divide on Sexual Assault
- SUNY professor says Trump win at least 87 percent certain; other polls 'bunk'
- Petition Started to Include Clarence Thomas in National African American Museum
- Garry Wills says there’s one human test we can use to decide who’s the better candidate: Trump or Clinton
- Get to Know the Semifinalists for the National Book Award
- Steven Runciman — historian, tease and professional enigma — is the subject of a biography
- Historian Eric Foner: Trump is Logical Conclusion of What the GOP Has Been Doing for Decades
- Ken Burns developing 'The Gene' based on Mukherjee's bestseller