In Crito (1766, 1767. 2 Vols. Pp 92-3), Burgh proposed building"an impenetrable wall of separation between things sacred and civil":
"I will fairly tell you what will be the consequences of your setting up such a mixed-mungrel-spiritual-temporal-secular-ecclesiastical establishment. You will make the dispensers of religion despicable and odious to all men of sense, and will destroy the spirituality, in which consists the: whole value, of religion..."Burgh is known for his explication of many issues, not only church-state separation and freedom of speech, but also gun ownership (2nd Amendment), standing armies (3rd) and rhetoric. Would love to see his Political Disquisitions, Crito, The Dignity of Human Nature (1754) and The Art of Speaking (1761) in print.
"Shew yourselves superior to all these follies and knaveries. Put into the hands of the people the clerical emoluments; and let them give them to whom they will; choosing their public teachers, and maintaining them decently, but moderately, as becomes their spiritual character. We have in our times a proof from the conduct of some among us, in respect of the appointment of their public administrators of religion, that such a scheme will answer all the necessary purposes, and prevent infinite corruption;--ecclesiastical corruption; the most odious of all corruption."
"Build an impenetrable wall of separation between things sacred and civil. Do not send a graceless officer, reeking from the anus of his trull, to the performance of a holy rite of religion, as a test for his holding the command of a regiment. To profane, in such a manner, a religion, which you pretend to reverence, is an impiety sufficient to bring down upon your heads, the roof of the sacred building you thus defile."
Just a thought.
comments powered by Disqus
Kenneth R Gregg - 7/10/2005
By all means, David!
Been meaning to send them my latest suggestions, including the works of Francis W. Hirst, Richard Cobden's son-in-law. I've been looking over his "Liberty & Tyranny," "The Political Economy of War," "Economic Freedom and Private Property," as well as the "F.W. Hirst by his Friends" (written after his death through the efforts of his wife, I believe).
As a Manchesterian, he was perfectly suited to write a treatise on war, and his "The Political Economy of War" has much to say to the current generation of classical liberals about the subject. The more that I sit back with his books, the more impressed that I have become.
Perhaps you can give a plug for Hirst as well, if I'm not being too presumpuous.
Just a thought.
David Timothy Beito - 7/9/2005
This seems like a worthy book reprinting project for Liberty Fund. If you have more information, I could put in a good word.
- Smithsonian launches campaign to raise $10 million for women’s history initiative
- Trump Was Not Always So Linguistically Challenged
- 75th anniversary of the World War 2 black uprising that the American public never heard about
- Longest serving governor in U.S. history to resign after confirmation as Trump's ambassador to China
- Did the First Human Ancestor Emerge in Europe, Not Africa?
- Jill Lepore: Americans Aren't Just Divided Politically, They're Divided Over History Too
- AHA joins protest of Trump’s plan for drastic cuts to the NEH
- Diane Ravitch says the Democrats paved the way for the education secretary's efforts to privatize our public schools
- Mark Moyar explains why he came to believe the Vietnam War was winnable
- How should Texas high schoolers learn history?