In Crito (1766, 1767. 2 Vols. Pp 92-3), Burgh proposed building"an impenetrable wall of separation between things sacred and civil":
"I will fairly tell you what will be the consequences of your setting up such a mixed-mungrel-spiritual-temporal-secular-ecclesiastical establishment. You will make the dispensers of religion despicable and odious to all men of sense, and will destroy the spirituality, in which consists the: whole value, of religion..."Burgh is known for his explication of many issues, not only church-state separation and freedom of speech, but also gun ownership (2nd Amendment), standing armies (3rd) and rhetoric. Would love to see his Political Disquisitions, Crito, The Dignity of Human Nature (1754) and The Art of Speaking (1761) in print.
"Shew yourselves superior to all these follies and knaveries. Put into the hands of the people the clerical emoluments; and let them give them to whom they will; choosing their public teachers, and maintaining them decently, but moderately, as becomes their spiritual character. We have in our times a proof from the conduct of some among us, in respect of the appointment of their public administrators of religion, that such a scheme will answer all the necessary purposes, and prevent infinite corruption;--ecclesiastical corruption; the most odious of all corruption."
"Build an impenetrable wall of separation between things sacred and civil. Do not send a graceless officer, reeking from the anus of his trull, to the performance of a holy rite of religion, as a test for his holding the command of a regiment. To profane, in such a manner, a religion, which you pretend to reverence, is an impiety sufficient to bring down upon your heads, the roof of the sacred building you thus defile."
Just a thought.
comments powered by Disqus
Kenneth R Gregg - 7/10/2005
By all means, David!
Been meaning to send them my latest suggestions, including the works of Francis W. Hirst, Richard Cobden's son-in-law. I've been looking over his "Liberty & Tyranny," "The Political Economy of War," "Economic Freedom and Private Property," as well as the "F.W. Hirst by his Friends" (written after his death through the efforts of his wife, I believe).
As a Manchesterian, he was perfectly suited to write a treatise on war, and his "The Political Economy of War" has much to say to the current generation of classical liberals about the subject. The more that I sit back with his books, the more impressed that I have become.
Perhaps you can give a plug for Hirst as well, if I'm not being too presumpuous.
Just a thought.
David Timothy Beito - 7/9/2005
This seems like a worthy book reprinting project for Liberty Fund. If you have more information, I could put in a good word.
- 'Sexist' Paris streets renamed in the name of feminism
- NYT profiles a path-breaking transgender pioneer who became a judge
- CIA Plans Huge Release of Top-Secret Reports From the 1960s
- South Dakota drops history as a high school requirement
- The Forgotten History Of 'Violent Displacement' That Helped Create The National Parks
- Historian author Antony Beevor says his new World War 2 book may anger Americans
- Ron Radosh and Allis Radosh plan to defend Warren Harding in a new book
- Historians tackle America’s mass incarceration problem
- Report: Russian studies in crisis
- Ken Burns: Donald Trump’s birtherism — a “politer way of saying the ‘N-word'” — proves America isn’t remotely “post-racial”