Note also the invitation, at the end of the post, for commenters to offer their own lists of significant differences between the wars in Iraq and Vietnam. A few commenters have taken a shot, and their comments are worth reading. But why is there always that one anonymous jackass who thinks it's worth the time to post the half-literate"you're argument is to stoopid for me to argue against, but your wrong" comment?
comments powered by Disqus
Louis N Proyect - 6/16/2005
I was actually interviewed by the Irish BBC about a year and a half ago on the similarities. After doing the interview, I discussed the differences on the listserv I moderate. These included:
1. State of economy: during Vietnam, you had wartime prosperity. Since the economy is weak today, workers are less inclined to cut the administration slack.
2. Absence of the USSR from the world scene: This means that the USA can adopt a more aggressive posture. If the USSR had not gone capitalist, it is likely that the invasion of Iraq would never have taken place since Iraq shared borders with the Soviet Union. If it had, it would have had to face a government that received considerable material support from the USSR.
3. Weakness of the radical movement: In the 1960s, the antiwar movement was led by the Trotskyist SWP which had a knack for uniting broader forces despite its sectarian make-up. Today, there is no such equivalent group. The WWP, which is an ally of Ramsey Clark, is ultraleft and divisive. The CPUSA, which spearheads the UfPJ coalition, is actually ambivalent on the occupation. It has pushed the UfPJ into sponsoring a tour of Iraqi trade unionists from the IFTU, which has given critical support to the occupation.
4. Quiescence in the black community: In the 1960s, people like Mohammed Ali and Martin Luther King Jr. were outspoken opponents of the war. Today, it is left to the rather dubious figure of Al Sharpton to express antiwar views on behalf of the black community.
5. The absence of a draft: Of course, this might change in months to come. If it does, batten down the hatches.
- Trump Holds Wide Lead in South Carolina
- An All-or-Nothing Fight for the Supreme Court
- Did Trump Really Lose the Debate?
- Scalia’s Death Sets Off Epic Battle
- Democrats See Gift in GOP Blocking Court Nominee
- Quote of the Day
- The Nastiest GOP Debate
- Reaction to the Republican Debate
- The GOP Presidential Debate
- How Clinton Could Respond on Supreme Court Vacancy
- Trump and Clinton Way Ahead in South Carolina
- McConnell Says Senate Will Wait to Replace Scalia
- Antonin Scalia Is Dead
- Clinton Says Sanders Would Be Threat to Obama Legacy
- Internal Tracker Shows Trump Leading in South Carolina
- Ben Carson used an apparently fake Joseph Stalin quote — and the Internet loved it
- Rubio exaggerates in saying it's been 80 years since a 'lame duck' made a Supreme Court nomination
- Humans Hard-Wired to Teach, Anthropologist Says
- Parents outraged after students shown ‘white guilt’ cartoon for Black History Month
- Maryland is once again considering retiring its state song
- Historian at the center of Sanders-Clinton debate
- James Loewen Says Additional Baltimore Confederate Statues Should be Removed
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- A historian’s advice to students thinking of getting a PhD in a tough economic climate
- German historian Heinz Richter cleared of charges