Note also the invitation, at the end of the post, for commenters to offer their own lists of significant differences between the wars in Iraq and Vietnam. A few commenters have taken a shot, and their comments are worth reading. But why is there always that one anonymous jackass who thinks it's worth the time to post the half-literate"you're argument is to stoopid for me to argue against, but your wrong" comment?
comments powered by Disqus
Louis N Proyect - 6/16/2005
I was actually interviewed by the Irish BBC about a year and a half ago on the similarities. After doing the interview, I discussed the differences on the listserv I moderate. These included:
1. State of economy: during Vietnam, you had wartime prosperity. Since the economy is weak today, workers are less inclined to cut the administration slack.
2. Absence of the USSR from the world scene: This means that the USA can adopt a more aggressive posture. If the USSR had not gone capitalist, it is likely that the invasion of Iraq would never have taken place since Iraq shared borders with the Soviet Union. If it had, it would have had to face a government that received considerable material support from the USSR.
3. Weakness of the radical movement: In the 1960s, the antiwar movement was led by the Trotskyist SWP which had a knack for uniting broader forces despite its sectarian make-up. Today, there is no such equivalent group. The WWP, which is an ally of Ramsey Clark, is ultraleft and divisive. The CPUSA, which spearheads the UfPJ coalition, is actually ambivalent on the occupation. It has pushed the UfPJ into sponsoring a tour of Iraqi trade unionists from the IFTU, which has given critical support to the occupation.
4. Quiescence in the black community: In the 1960s, people like Mohammed Ali and Martin Luther King Jr. were outspoken opponents of the war. Today, it is left to the rather dubious figure of Al Sharpton to express antiwar views on behalf of the black community.
5. The absence of a draft: Of course, this might change in months to come. If it does, batten down the hatches.
- Rubio Surges Into Second In New Hampshire
- Branstad Says Cruz Ran ‘Unethical’ Campaign
- Christie Highlights Santorum’s Endorsement of Rubio
- Portman Comes Out Against Trade Deal
- Megyn Kelly Gets a Book Deal
- A Big List of the Bad Things Clinton Has Done
- An Unambiguous Sign Sanders Won Last Night’s Debate
- Still Friends at the End
- Quote of the Day
- Trump Still Leads as Clinton Slips
- Clinton Can’t Shake Image as Wall Street’s Friend
- Maddow Doesn’t See Sanders Winning
- Why Does the Media Still Shield Chelsea Clinton?
- Bush Jokes His Mother May Have Abused Him
- Rubio Closes the Gap in New Hampshire
- Newly released interactive map shows images of destroyed monuments of Mosul
- How the Rise of the Post Office Explains American Innovation
- These Americans are reliving history and don’t mind repeating it
- Britain largest home is saved for the nation
- Shelter and the slums: capturing bleak Britain 50 years ago
- WSJ features an article by a conservative calling for the abolition of Black History Month
- Mary Beard, herself a bestselling author, wonders why more women historians aren't
- Princeton U. historian Imani Perry claims mistreatment in parking ticket arrest
- Retired historian George Dennison remains on the payroll at the U. of Montana while faculty are cut
- The Atlantic profiles exciting ways to teach history