HILLARY BACKS DOWN
Clinton told reporters in Washington that the United States has an"absolute commitment to Israel's security" -- a shift in nuance compared with her characterization Friday of the United States as a"strong supporter" of Israel's security. She also hailed the" close, unshakable bond" between the two countries, in contrast to her comment Friday that"our relationship is durable and strong."
Such distinctions may seem minor, but they carry weight in the Middle East, where every line and comma is scrutinized. The office of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu immediately issued a statement saying that Israel"appreciates and respects the warm words" from Clinton on"the deep bond between the U.S. and Israel, and on the U.S. commitment to Israel's security."
Netanyahu's brother in law can afford to be honest about Rev. Wright's protege, even if Bibi cannot:
In an interview with Israel Army Radio on Wednesday, Hagai Ben Artzi, the brother of Netanyahu's wife Sara, reportedly said:"it needs to be said clearly and simply: There is an anti-Semitic president in the US. It's not that Obama doesn't sympathize with [Mr. Netanyahu]. He doesn't sympathize with the people of Israel."
Netanyahu's office swifty published a condemnation:"I entirely reject the remarks of Hagai Ben Artzi."
comments powered by Disqus
- 159 scholars at Harvard sign petition reprimanding the school for rejections of Chelsea Manning and Michelle Jones
- Fact Check: Steve Bannon’s Bad History
- The Story Behind the Truman Quote in President Trump's U.N. Speech
- As Trump Declares Missing in Action Recognition Day, How Many Service Members Are Missing?
- The ‘nation’s report card’ says it assesses critical thinking in history
- Eric Foner discusses the manipulation of history
- Male historian tapped to lead Department of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at the University of Kansas
- Decline in History Majors Continues, Departments Respond
- He’s 75 now. When he started teaching at the University of New Orleans students walked out on his class.
- ‘Fake news’ from 1738 offers lessons for modern historians, says Missouri scholar