Tom Friedman's Terror Prediction
Maybe he's right. Maybe not. It's as plausible a theory as any I've heard. But of course we don't really know what the terrorists are thinking, do we?
Trying to guess what they are thinking is the job of the CIA.
We would do well to focus on something else, I'd suggest. And that is trying to figure out how to drive a wedge between terrorists and the broader Muslim community of the Middle East.
That should be the top priority of the American government in foreign policy.
And the one thing I worry about is this. Is it likely we can achieve this goal as long as we have a largely Christian army in the middle of the largely Muslim Middle East?
Not bloody likely.
comments powered by Disqus
mark safranski - 4/16/2005
The Bangladeshis and Nigerians tend to be quite deployable for peacekeeping operations in return for certain considerations - sort of like the Hessians and Swiss Guards but without the flashy parade ground presence.
Seriously, the Muslim army will have to built from the ground up in Iraq and Afghanistan. It can be done, particularly in Iraq, but it is a slow and unglamorous process that can't be rushed if we want units that will stand and fight instead of making like ARVN.
- Historians at loggerheads over the AP standards
- Bettany Hughes interview: The historian on how Socrates would have solved Greece's problems
- U.K. Released Hundreds of Nazis After the Holocaust, Says Leading Historian
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- Historians Against the War gathering signatures for new resolution to AHA on alleged violations of academic freedom in Israel