Tom Friedman's Terror Prediction
Maybe he's right. Maybe not. It's as plausible a theory as any I've heard. But of course we don't really know what the terrorists are thinking, do we?
Trying to guess what they are thinking is the job of the CIA.
We would do well to focus on something else, I'd suggest. And that is trying to figure out how to drive a wedge between terrorists and the broader Muslim community of the Middle East.
That should be the top priority of the American government in foreign policy.
And the one thing I worry about is this. Is it likely we can achieve this goal as long as we have a largely Christian army in the middle of the largely Muslim Middle East?
Not bloody likely.
comments powered by Disqus
mark safranski - 4/16/2005
The Bangladeshis and Nigerians tend to be quite deployable for peacekeeping operations in return for certain considerations - sort of like the Hessians and Swiss Guards but without the flashy parade ground presence.
Seriously, the Muslim army will have to built from the ground up in Iraq and Afghanistan. It can be done, particularly in Iraq, but it is a slow and unglamorous process that can't be rushed if we want units that will stand and fight instead of making like ARVN.
- Coming Soon, a Century Late: A Black Film Gem
- The discovery that complicated the history of sex change operations
- NYT identifies the person who exposed Gary Hart's philandering
- Decades After Trinity Nuclear Test in New Mexico, U.S. Studies Cancer Fallout
- Lawrence Of Arabia's Hand-Drawn, WWI Map Is Up for Auction
- Ken Burns is in a race to slow us down
- Ken Burns and the Myth of Theodore Roosevelt
- What Ken Burns Doesn't Understand about the Roosevelts
- A call for historians to do macro history
- Colorado school board, worried about the new AP framework, wants to make sure high school kids are taught patriotic history