Yet she is now confined to her home (not her entire property) until August. It may be a nice home, but that does not change the fact that the state intends to humiliate her. It goes to show that the state will tolerate many things. But lying to its agents is not one of them. Of course, those agents are perfectly free to lie to us.
comments powered by Disqus
Tom G Palmer - 3/6/2005
Good for you, Sheldon! Few people will stand up for someone who's been prosecuted/persecuted for the crime of being successful. Alan Reynolds did a nice job of dissecting the cast at http://www.cato.org/research/articles/reynolds-040309.html
Max Swing - 3/4/2005
I can't say anything more, than that I feel deeply sympathic towards that woman, who lost everything to a state that had no right to meddle with her on THAT basis.
- Did a historian who said he’s a victim of McCarthyism get the story wrong?
- Stephanie Coontz’s work on the history of marriage cited by the Supreme Court.
- How Does It Feel To Have One’s Work as a Historian Cited by the Supreme Court? Cool. Very Cool. Thank You Very Much.
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- David Hackett Fischer wins $100,000 prize for lifetime achievement in military writing