Social Security Confusion
But he's wrong in this paragraph:
Which brings us to the president's proposal for private accounts. I like that proposal for three reasons. First, it will encourage people to save. Second, it will give people choices, and choices are good. And third, it will give more voters a stake in the capitalist system, making them more likely to vote for the sort of pro-growth policies that will improve the quality of life for us in our old age and our grandchildren.
Bush’s plan may not encourage new savings, but only shift savings from one form to another. The new choices it will provide will be limited and may be offset by the government's power to interfere in, or at least influence, the capital markets. And there is no reason to believe it will make people think like capitalists. That's a Marxist position that I can see no justification for. So-called private retirement accounts are more likely to extend the entitlement mentality to stock-market returns—and that would be very bad. On this subject see my Freeman article “No Shortcuts” (pdf).
Hat tip: Jude Blanchette
comments powered by Disqus
Sheldon Richman - 2/24/2005
Tom's points are valid. I said only that it "may not" encourage new savings.
Tom G Palmer - 2/23/2005
But it's not a matter of shifting savings from one form to another. Rather than having 6.2 percent of your income taken from you and dropped into the Pay-As-You-Go system, over which you exercise no control at all and over which you have no ownership rights, you will have the option of putting into investments that you would own. It's not perfect, but it's a big improvement over what is imposed on us now. Since making that choice diminishes your future claim on Social Security, I see no reason that it would induce people to diminish any other savings.
Sheldon Richman - 2/23/2005
People may reduce their 401(k) or IRA contributions after setting up a private retirement account.
John H. Lederer - 2/23/2005
"Bush’s plan may not encourage new savings, but only shift savings from one form to another."
Can you illuminate, please.
- Rubio Surges Into Second In New Hampshire
- Branstad Says Cruz Ran ‘Unethical’ Campaign
- Christie Highlights Santorum’s Endorsement of Rubio
- Portman Comes Out Against Trade Deal
- Megyn Kelly Gets a Book Deal
- A Big List of the Bad Things Clinton Has Done
- An Unambiguous Sign Sanders Won Last Night’s Debate
- Still Friends at the End
- Quote of the Day
- Trump Still Leads as Clinton Slips
- Clinton Can’t Shake Image as Wall Street’s Friend
- Maddow Doesn’t See Sanders Winning
- Why Does the Media Still Shield Chelsea Clinton?
- Bush Jokes His Mother May Have Abused Him
- Rubio Closes the Gap in New Hampshire
- Humans Hard-Wired to Teach, Anthropologist Says
- Parents outraged after students shown ‘white guilt’ cartoon for Black History Month
- Maryland is once again considering retiring its state song
- One of the last remaining Nazis goes on trial in Germany
- Inside story finally told of the young US diplomat who cracked the case of the murder of 4 nuns in El Salvador in 1980
- Historian at the center of Sanders-Clinton debate
- James Loewen Says Additional Baltimore Confederate Statues Should be Removed
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- A historian’s advice to students thinking of getting a PhD in a tough economic climate
- German historian Heinz Richter cleared of charges