The most interesting aspect of the tapes may be the light they shed on Bush's willingness to engage in hardball politics. He says on the tapes that he is ready to go after Steve Forbes if Forbes goes after him. Sometimes you have to play rough in politics--like his dad did against Dukakis, he says.
This is not exactly the portrait of the president that he presents to his evangelical supporters. They seem to think he is doing God's work. He seems to think he's just a politician.
Of course, as Wolf Blitzer noted today on CNN it's been well known that Bush plays hard ball when he has to, as he did in South Carolina against McCain in the spring 2000 primary.
But the Bush people always officially distanced themselves from the attacks on McCain and they certainly didn't let anybody see Bush's own fingerprints when McCain was being knifed.
So the tapes fill in the gap between how campaigns say they are conducting themselves and how they actually do.
Moreover, it is quite one thing to read that a president is making political calculations and quite another to hear it directly. The impact is greater. It's the difference between being told that Howard Dean screamed at the top of his lungs when he lost the Iowa primary and seeing him do it.
All presidents present one face to the public and another to friends. That's politics.
I don't doubt that Americans have grown cynical since Vietnam and Watergate. But Bush's evangelical supporters do tend to think that God is driving his agenda. I have friends whose parents think this. To see that Bush is an ordinary mortal who makes political calculations like any other politician--well, that is worth pondering.
comments powered by Disqus
Michael Meo - 2/27/2005
I tend to see politicians as people interested in wielding political power. But then none of my friends' parents have much of an opinion of President Bush, because my friends' parents are almost all dead.
We're in different generations, all right.
- Did a historian who said he’s a victim of McCarthyism get the story wrong?
- Stephanie Coontz’s work on the history of marriage cited by the Supreme Court.
- How Does It Feel To Have One’s Work as a Historian Cited by the Supreme Court? Cool. Very Cool. Thank You Very Much.
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- David Hackett Fischer wins $100,000 prize for lifetime achievement in military writing