William Raspberry: A 'Sorry' Excuse From Cochran
...But when the U.S. Senate sought to speak to that past, with a resolution of apology for the body's failure to enact anti-lynching legislation, missing from a list of 85 sponsors were Mississippi's Republican senators, Trent Lott and Thad Cochran.
Okay, maybe I wasn't too surprised by Lott's nonparticipation. After all, he is the guy who was stripped of his party leadership role three years ago for voicing the opinion that America would have been better off if Strom Thurmond had won his overtly segregationist 1948 presidential campaign.
But Cochran, though conservative, is thought to be less wildly right-wing than Lott -- what you might call a Mississippi moderate. So why was his name absent from the list of sponsors?
"I'm not in the business of apologizing for what someone else did or didn't do," he told me. "I deplore and regret that lynching occurred and that those committing them weren't punished, but I'm not culpable. Would you apologize for an editorial written by The Washington Post 50 years ago that you disagreed with?"
The trouble with that explanation is that Cochran did sign on as a co-sponsor of bills apologizing for the government's treatment of Native Americans and for the World War II internment of Japanese Americans.
Why did he find it so difficult to apologize for the Senate's failure to deal with the anti-lynching legislation passed by the House?
More than 4,700 lynchings took place in the years between 1882 and 1968, according to Tuskegee Institute, with Mississippi leading the pack with 581.
The resolution was symbolic, of course. So, in many ways, is the action that has brought Killen to trial 41 years after the fact. But it is a powerful symbol of a desire to atone not just for the crime of murder but for the prevailing attitude that, for many Mississippians, made lynching acceptable.
It is important that it isn't the feds but Mississippians who have made this trial happen. Former Mississippi secretary of state Dick Molpus may have started the process with a speech of regret he made 16 years ago. That speech was followed by an interview with the mother of Andrew Goodman, one of the three slain civil rights workers, by the editor of the Neshoba Democrat. Philadelphia is in Neshoba County.
Others involved in pushing the matter include former governor William Winter's Institute for Racial Reconciliation, the NAACP, Medgar Evers Institute and scores of ordinary Mississippians chagrined by the state's racist reputation.
Not very long ago, such a coalition would have been unimaginable, and anyone who proposed such a thing would have been visited by nightriders...
...They understand what seems to escape Thad Cochran: Institutions are more than their incumbents. Mississippi, like the U.S. Senate, is a continuing entity. If the entity believes it has erred, it isn't unreasonable that it apologize. Didn't Pope John Paul II, speaking at Israel's Holocaust memorial, apologize for Christian treatment of Jews?
And to answer the senator's question: As an independent contractor for The Post, I have no standing to speak for the newspaper. But surely a newspaper's editorial board could reasonably apologize for a 50-year-old opinion if it now considered that opinion wrongheaded and offensive.
comments powered by Disqus
- Most Millennials Resist the ‘Millennial’ Label
- Isis profits from destruction of antiquities by selling relics to dealers – and then blowing up the buildings they come from to conceal the evidence of looting
- China military parade commemorates WW2 victory over Japan
- New documentary explores the legacy of the 5,000 Rosenwald schools set up by a Sears magnate and Booker T. Washington
- Rare silent Native American movie of 1920s attracting a lot of interest
- AHA President Vicki L. Ruiz named National Humanities Medalist
- Historians of Color Are Revolutionizing the Narrative of ‘American Exceptionalism’
- Henry VIII voted worst monarch in history
- The Fuhrer style: Historian says press coverage of Hitler’s lavish life fueled his rise to power
- Two scholars from UT object to the Texas school's decision to remove the statue of Jefferson Davis