Samuel Alito 
-
SOURCE: Politico
6/2/2022
What Alito Got Wrong about the History of Abortion
by Leslie J. Reagan
"The logic that Alito uses in the draft opinion leans heavily on history — history that he gets egregiously wrong."
-
6/5/2022
Discarding Legal Precedent to Control Women's Reproductive Rights is Rooted in Colonial Slavery
by Clyde W. Ford
The colonial Virginia lawsuit of Elizabeth Key, who won freedom in 1656, pushed colonial authorities to reverse precedent to ensure that the law would be a tool for maintaining hierarchies of race, gender, and class, and Black women's bodies would be the battleground of those conflicts.
-
6/5/2022
What Would Madison Think of Originalism? Depends When You Asked Him
by Don Fraser
James Madison moved away from a strict constructionist position based on public necessity and acceptance of legislation based in implied powers. Whatever one can say about the originalist legal theory behind the leaked Dobbs opinion, it's not Madisonian.
-
5/29/2022
Originalism, History, and Religiosity are the Faults of Alito's Reasoning in Dobbs
by Robert Spitzer
Justice Alito wrote in Dobbs that Roe v. Wade was “egregiously wrong from the start.” But that tart conclusion more aptly applies to the draft verdict of the good justice.
-
SOURCE: The Guardian
5/19/2022
Alito's Opinion Shows Roe is Only the Beginning
by Thomas Zimmer
The entire idea of substantive due process under the 14th Amendment is called into question by the draft opinion, potentially threatening reproductive rights, civil rights, and sexual freedom in service of a reactionary ideal of patriarchal society.
-
SOURCE: The Atlantic
5/3/2022
Is Alito's Plan to Repeal the 20th Century?
Alito's invocation of Plessy v. Ferguson as a reason to discard precedent is galling because his opinion would destroy the kind of protection under law that Homer Plessy actually sought.
-
SOURCE: The New Yorker
5/4/2022
Abortion Isn't in the Constituiton? Neither are Women
by Jill Lepore
"Women are indeed missing from the Constitution. That’s a problem to remedy, not a precedent to honor."
-
SOURCE: Education News
5-12-15
Historian Alan Singer says he’s not qualified to be on the Supreme Court and neither are Roberts, Scalia, Alito or Thomas
That’s because he’s an activist and so are they.
News
- Haitian Americans Reclaim the Traditions of Vodou from Centuries of Misperception
- DeSantis Proposes Surveying Students, Faculty on Political Views
- Philly Plan for Tubman Memorial Draws Fire: Were Black Artists Excluded?
- One Absurdity of Texas's Divisive Concepts Law? Call to Rename Slave Trade as "Involuntary Relocation"
- 3 Law Profs: Connecting Abortion and Voting Rights at SCOTUS
- If "Heathen" Sounds Outdated, Historian Kathryn Gim Lum Says it Still Explains Racism in America
- How The Court Just Changed America
- The Crisis Historian Has Bad News About the Crisis
- Joint OAH-AHA Statement on Dobbs Decision
- Academics Worry Florida's Academic Legislation is Coming to the Rest of the Nation