Blogs > Liberty and Power > Sweet Home Alabama (for once)

Dec 15, 2004

Sweet Home Alabama (for once)






comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


David T. Beito - 12/16/2004

Don't be sure that states rights are the wrong approach. If anyone has the right to speak for the "people" of the U.S. right now it is George Bush. He is the same man who wants to trump states rights not only on pot but gay marriage and in education (as in no child left behind). Under present circumstances, a states rights approach makes the most sense on a host of civil liberties.

For this reason, King's (largely principled) defense of states rights is an important step forward and represents a hopeful sign that not all conservatives are in lockstep with the theory behind Dubya's new centralism.

I certainly agree, however, that Alabama is retrogressive on the drug issue. I served on jury duty for a week about a month ago and was in the pool for five cases during that time. Three of them were drug possession cases.


Chris Rasmussen - 12/16/2004

While it is nice to see the AG of your state, David, supporting California - my home state - I feel that there are more things wrong with what Mr. King said than are right. First, the AG (and obviously, this is to be expected from any state official) seems to feel that rights belong to states and not to the people first. Secondly, and this relates to the first, the AG's "support" comes with the rejection of the rights of anyone - Californian or Alabaman - to use marijuana. Thus, I think it is premature to declare this as a victory for anyone.