comments powered by Disqus
More Comments:
Jonathan Dresner - 11/29/2004
I suspect that question will be pretty well answered when we see who the new hires are.
Richard Henry Morgan - 11/29/2004
it would be interesting to see some more particulars on the program there at Penn. Many of the traditional programs in history of science started either as independent programs in history of science, or as part of a wave in the '50's and '60's, as history and philosophy of science programs.
Then came the Edinburgh school (the strong thesis in the sociology of knowledge, as opposed to Mertonian sociology, such as still survives at Columbia within the sociology department there). In the '90's Edinburgh-style programs popped up in the UK and the US. It would be interesting to see just how Penn integrates sociology into its program -- whether it tends toward the history and philosophy of science approach of, say, Pittsburgh, or the sociology of knowledge approach of the Edinburgh school.
Jonathan Dresner - 11/28/2004
It might be worth asking them by whom they were told that it was to be dissolved. There's often quite a lag (and sometimes an unadulterated error) between what departments do and think versus what administrative offices like admissions know. Prospective students get told all kinds of junk...
Bridget D. Collins - 11/28/2004
My classmates who were told that it was dissolved will be very interested to hear this.