History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.
I'm aware of how overused is the word "racist"--not least by leftists. Many would apply "racist" to anyone who questions the wisdom of affirmative action policies. That's why I'm reluctant to bandy the word around. The second edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (1989) defines racism as "The theory that distinctive human characteristics and abilities are determined by race"; and, secondly, as synonymous with racialism, which it defines as "Belief in the superiority of a particular race leading to prejudice and antagonism towards people of other races, esp. those in close proximity who may be felt as a threat to one's cultural and racial integrity or economic well-being." Are leftists who refer to Condoleezza Rice as an Aunt Jemima really subscribing to either view? And if not, is it fair to call them racist because their remarks are characteristic of those who do hold such views?
Why the quotes around "racist" Mark? In my book, calling Rice "Aunt Jemima" plays on old, repugnant stereotypes about black women. There's no question about it: it's racist. I certainly agree there are much better reasons to criticize her, but why back away from charging her leftist critics with racism?