Blogs > Liberty and Power > When the Moon Hits Your Eye Like a Big Pizza Pie, Is It Allah?

Aug 25, 2004

When the Moon Hits Your Eye Like a Big Pizza Pie, Is It Allah?




[cross-posted at Austro-Athenian Empire]

Apparently Pat Robertson is telling his followers that the God of Islam is actually a pagan moon god with no relation to the Judeo-Christian Biblical God. An internet search reveals that this silliness has become quite common on the Christian right.

Not being a Christian, Jew, or Muslim -- nor a worshipper of a moon god, for that matter -- I suppose I have no dog in this fight. (The one true god is of course Zeus, whom the Greek philosophers identified with reason or the logical structure of reality.) But c'mon!

The word"al-lah,""al-ilah," simply means"the god" in Arabic (thus mirroring the New Testament's term for God -- ho theos,"the god"). Christians and Jews writing in Arabic have always used the term"Allah" for the Judeo-Christian God; indeed, as the 6th-century Umm al-Jimal inscription in Jordan shows, Arabic Christians were using"Allah" as a term for God before Islam even arose."Allah" means God the One and Only. Period.

Now it may well be true that the term"Allah" was also used in pre-Islamic times for a less impressive deity, a member of a polytheistic pantheon. But so what? As is well known, exactly the same is true of the Hebrew terms"Yahweh,""El," and"Elohim," used in the Bible as names of God. Early Jewish tradition assigns Yahweh a wife, Asherah. The term"Yahweh" was used by the Moabites as another name for the Canaanite god Ba'al; indeed,"El,""-ilah," and"Ba'al" are all obvious cognates, and are recognised by Biblical scholars as having a common origin. And the word"Elohim" shows its polytheistic origins in its very structure: it is the result of adding a masculine plural ending to a feminine singular noun (thereby strangely deriving a masculine singular:"he is the goddess-men"). If Islam has pagan roots, so do Judaism and Christianity.

The fact that the Arabic term for God once referred merely to one god among many no more proves that Muslims today are worshipping a moon god than the fact that the Hebrew terms for God once referred merely to one god among many proves that Jews and Christians today are worshipping a tribal deity with many wives. Etymology is not theology. St. Paul had more sense than many of his modern followers when he accepted, as legitimate references to the Christian God, pagan Greek verses describing Zeus as an immaterial, monotheistic creator. What god one worships presumably has more to do with how one conceives of her than with what names one calls her. [For any Kripkeans who may be reading this: no, I'm not rejecting causal origin as irrelevant; I think it's one, but only one, element in the disjunctive complex that determines a term's meaning. But that's a story for another day.]

So how does Islam conceive of God? Do Muslims in any interesting sense worship a"moon god"? The answer lies in the Qur'an, verses 6.75-79:

Thus did we show Abraham the kingdom of the heavens and the earth, that he might be among those possessing certainty:

When the night grew dark upon him, he beheld a star. He said: This is my Lord. But when it set, he said: I love not things that set.

And when he saw the moon rising in splendour, he said: This is my Lord. But when it set, he said: If my Lord had not guided me I should certainly be one of those who have gone astray.

And when he saw the sun rising in splendour, he said: This is my Lord! This is the greatest! But when it set he cried: O my people! Behold, I am no longer deceived by your false encumbrances.

For surely I have turned my face toward him who created the heavens and the earth, as one by nature upright, and I am not of the idolaters.
In other words: moon god my ass.


comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Irfan Khawaja - 8/4/2006

David and Jonathan--

Just split the difference and you'll be OK.

Islam closer to Judaism:
Jesus is a mere prophet in a long line of mostly Hebrew prophets, rather than the Son of God; the Trinity is rejected as polytheism; the Islamic rituals and ritual language are strikingly similar to Judaism; very similar emphasis on holy law, e.g., lots of stuff you can't eat and stuff women can't wear; plus one Quranic verse is directly cribbed from the Book of Psalms, but none cribbed from the New Testament.

Islam closer to Christianity:
Emphasis on proselytization; Jesus makes a cameo appearance in a favorable light; conception of individual salvation, heaven, hell, angels; at one time ruled much of the planet, but no longer does.

As for affinities to moon gods, I think Roderick's comment is about right. Having been to Mecca for the pilgrimage, I did think there was a pagan "feel" to the ritualistic circumambulation of the Black Stone, but the whole time one is chanting "Labaayk, ullah huma labaayk" ("I have come before your presence, Lord...I have come; boy have I come; damn, gotta tell ya, I'm really here; I'm here God, can ya hear me?"; repeat ten thousand times, etc.), which dispels any temptations to actual paganism. Plus if you tried to worship the moon, they would definitely shoot you.


Jonathan Dresner - 8/26/2004

God as Judge is a powerful trope within Judaism, and the Zoroastrian messianism (Everything has earlier antecedents) that the Rabbis brought back from the Diaspora is directly responsible for the idea of the Day of Judgement in all three faiths (though the same trope exists in Egypt's Osiris, as well, it doesn't seem directly responsible). There was quite a bit of discussion of heaven and hell among rabbinic scholars as well (more heaven, as I understand it; though hell has been part of the Jewish folk tradition, it's never been as central as it is in the other two, and many common Jewish folk versions of the afterlife involve a period of cleansing before entering heaven, but no eternal damnation for souls).

And Judaism was a proselytizing faith, as well, until the Romans and Christians (and, to a lesser extent, Islamic rule) beat it out of us.

But there's a good case to be made for this as a sort of Rorshach moment, too.


David T. Beito - 8/25/2004

I originally thought that but after reading it it seems to be closer to the Christian tradition.

The more Christian elements include a fair amount of references to Jesus (including an endorsement of Virgin birth), the belief in a day of judgement, a belief in universal salvation, and numerous references to heaven and hell. The frequent references to heaven and hell (almost every Sura mentions it in grisly terms) does not seem very Judaic.


Jonathan Dresner - 8/25/2004

I haven't, actually, read the entire Quran, but I would put the radical monotheism of Islam (and its emphasis on worldly ethics) closer to Judaism, particularly the rabbinic Judaism of Mohammed's time, than to Christianity. Though I suppose you could make a case that it connects to some of the non-trinitarian Christian traditions.


David T. Beito - 8/25/2004

I just finished reading the Koran. Boy was that tedious! There is not even a hint of a "moon god" tradition in it. Basically, Islam seems to be best described as a Christian hertical sect. In fact, the whole book fits rather comfortably into the "Judeo-Christian" tradition much beloved by conservatives.