Blogs > Liberty and Power > George Washington and John Adams

Apr 2, 2009

George Washington and John Adams




Several of those commenting on my presidential rankings have questioned my rating of George Washington as the 15th worst president in U.S. history and John Adams as the 10th worst. So I thought I would devote a separate post to explaining myself.

I knew my rating of Washington would raise some eyebrows. To start with, I believe that the replacement of the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution was a terrible mistake in American history. The major problem with the Articles is that it created a central government that was too strong, not one that was too weak. So to the extent that Washington contributed to the Constitution's success, he earns a minus from me rather than a plus, as most historians would give him.

But even ignoring that, we still confront Washington's appointment of Alexander Hamilton as Secretary of the Treasury, with Hamilton's State-aggrandizing and mercantilist financial program: including an array of internal taxes (all later repealed under Jefferson), the assumption of state government debts (when the states should have assumed the federal debt, if not repudiated it outright), the establishment of the First U.S. Bank, and the creation of a government mint. For more detailed discussion of these issues, see an article I published back in 1988 in the British libertarian publication, Free Life, v. 5, n. 4, entitled"The Constitution as Counter-Revolution: A Tribute to the Anti-Federalists."

The Washington Administration furthermore used trouble with the Indians in the Northwest territory to justify a greatly expanded army of four thousand regulars. Not only did this military establishment swallow more than two-thirds of the remaining half of national expenditures not devoted to paying interest on Hamilton's huge debt, but it also makes Washington the president who initiated at the national level expropriation and extermination of Native Americans. Although Congress refused to go along with the Secretary of War Knox's plan for a federally trained and supervised militia, the Uniform Militia Act of 1792 etched the principle of universal military obligation into national statute. A second congressional act specified the conditions under which the militia could be called into national service and instituted heavy militia fines for failure to report when drafted.

Through the use of patronage within the new federal judiciary and the executive bureaucracy, supplemented by the pervasive influence of the debt, the public lands, the central bank, and the militarist Society of the Cincinnati, the Washington Administration created an effective "court party" of rent seeking Federalists. Any doubts about the national government's new grandeur were dramatically dispelled in 1794, when it smashed the Whiskey Tax Rebellion in western Pennsylvania. For this demonstration, Washington called up from four state militias no less than 12,950 men--more than he had usually commanded throughout the entire American Revolution. The widespread reliance upon militia conscription to raise this overwhelming force sparked further disturbances in eastern Pennsylvania, Virginia and Maryland.

Even Washington's foreign policy led to infringements on American liberty. His Neutrality Proclamation of 1793 applied to the actions of private citizens as well as to those of the government. Congress backed Washington's proclamation with the country's first neutrality act the following year, forbidding U.S. citizens from enlisting in a foreign military or fitting out a foreign armed vessel in U.S. ports. Congress also imposed a temporary embargo, closing all U.S. ports to foreign commerce. Finally, Congress ordered construction of six frigates, the first U.S. naval vessels since 1784, when the remnant of the Continental Navy had been sold off. After contracting for a navy to fight Algiers and restricting the liberty of those Americans enthusiastic about the French Revolution, the Washington Administration turned around and signed Jay's Treaty, with terms indecently favorable to the British State.

As for John Adams, one commenter suggested that the only blemish on his presidential record is the Alien and Sedition Acts. In reality, the only positive thing about his administration was Adams's break with Hamilton's High Federalists and his willingness to negotiate an end to the undeclared naval war with France (as vividly portrayed in the TV mini-series). But those who admire this as a courageous about face seem to overlook that it was the Adams Administration that got the country into that war in the first place.

The Quasi-War, as it was called, occasioned a government embargo of all trade with France. Congress authorized a forty-ship navy (which Jefferson later curtailed and partly sold off), established a separate Navy Department, and reactivated the Marine Corps. After George Logan, an ex-Quaker from Philadelphia, traveled on his own to France and returned to report that the French were now interested in conciliation, Congress passed the infamous Logan Act, which prohibited future private diplomacy.

Although British naval superiority made the threat of French invasion non-existent, Congress provided for a quadrupling of the standing army's size, to 14,500 soldiers, and laid plans for a Provisional Army of trained reserves numbering tens of thousands more. Paying for the new navy and enlarged army required more revenue, as expenditures nearly doubled. Anticipating the crisis, Adams had already signed into law a stamp tax in 1797. Among the legal transactions requiring stamp duties were legacies and probates, making this the U.S. government's first inheritance tax.

Once war began, Congress added a direct tax on real estate. John Fries, a disaffected Federalist, led a rebellion against the new tax in eastern Pennsylvania. This time, rather than using the militia to suppress a tax revolt (as had the Washington Administration), the Adams Administration set the ominous precedent of using the army. The rebels were quickly overawed, and Fries and two of his cohorts were tried for treason and sentenced to be hanged (although Adams, to his credit, pardoned them once peace was restored). Adams's undeclared naval war was also responsible for the first federal relief: hospitals for sick and disabled seamen, a measure from which the U.S. Public Health Service ultimately descended. Finally, the war saw the first national quarantine act.

When you add the the outrageous violations of civil liberties under the Alien and Sedition Acts, it is hard to find much admirable during the Adams presidency. (As a footnote, of the four Alien and Sedition Acts, the only one that subsequently did not expire or was not repealed, the Alien Enemy Act, became the basis for Woodrow Wilson's internment of enemy aliens during World War I.)



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


William Stepp - 3/9/2009

Jeff:

Right on Lincoln's body count and assault on trade; maybe the Woodster gets an asterisk.
Speaking of abolishing slavery, I'm just digging into Jim Powell's book on Greatest Emancipations ($7.50 at Strand; check out its website). It looks good, but alas no reference to the main man Spooner, and evidently little or no discussion of the economics of slavery. Maybe it's buried somewhere and I didn't see it on a cursory look through.


RickC - 3/9/2009

Wow. Great explanation, great comments.

As a layperson who has quite a bit of reading under my belt, it still stuns me to learn how little I actually know. I was the one who made the comment about Adams you mentioned.

I've read two biographies of Adams and Thompson's book on Adams'impact on the Constitution, which wasn't really a bio. Yet, some of the things you list about Adams in this short article I had never come across before. Stunning.

I agree about Lincoln. I wrote a friend a while back that in terms of impact, all negative, Lincoln probably casts a larger shadow than any person in history. Without Lincoln there might not have been a Wilson (perhaps no Hitler?), FDR, Bush and now Obama. It kind of reminds me of Dr. Higgs' "ratchet effect" theory on the growth of government.

It is dismaying and alarming to me that Lincoln continues to be enshrined by so many as our greatest. This is especially true for professional historians, who should know better.


Jeffrey Rogers Hummel - 3/9/2009

Bill: you make a strong case for ranking Wilson worse than Lincoln. But I cannot ignore the much higher body count under Lincoln, given that if the North had been interested in abolishing slavery rather than preserving the Union, there was an alternative set up policies that certainly would have brought down slavery in an independent Confederacy by the turn of century, if not sooner, with much less bloodshed. Nor can I overlook that it was the protectionist Lincoln Administration that first reversed the worldwide classical-liberal triumph of free trade, with Bismarck's Germany following behind, and an ultimate descent into World War I.


William Stepp - 3/8/2009

Is it against libertarian protocol to inquire if the presidents had positive accomplishments? If so,
maybe Washington's Farewell Address would qualify. The only two good things I know of done by FDR are ending Prohibition and freeing the poor remaining stragglers overlooked by Harding and Coolidge, who had been jailed by St. Woodrow the Worst.
Other presidents did good things (cutting spending and advocating principled libertarian positions on certain issues, to list two things)--by these measures Van Buren, Cleveland, Coolidge, and Harding had pluses in their records. Any others?
To stretch things out a bit, would Dick Milhous welcoming Elvis to the White House count?
Okay, maybe that's a bit of a stretch, like treating the family dog well, and organizing Easter egg hunts.


csense - 3/7/2009

Adams funded a hospital for "sick and disabled seamen"? That heartless bastard! How dare he crush the liberties of the people with such ruthless schemes!


William Stepp - 3/7/2009

Good case(s) on Washington vs. Adams, but I wouldn't count Washington's role in the replacement of the Articles by the Constitution against his presidential record. The Constituion went into affect when the ninth state, New Hampshire, ratified it about May or June of 1788. Washington wasn't coronated until the end of April 1789.
One measure of presidential badness might each one's comparative record of the erection of permanent (or quasi-permanent) institutions of depredation on the economy and individual rights (including the rights of people in other countries, such as the ability to travel to or reside in the U.S., and to trade freely with people in the U.S.).
By this measure, I'm not sure Lincoln is the worst. The Civil War was horrible to be sure, but the only bad lasting effect of if, I think, is the payment of money to veterans (wounded veterans?). (I'm not sure about VA hospitals.)
Lincoln's income tax was short-lived compared to Wilson's, which lives on in a much more horribly enlarged and intrusive form. The former's monetary inteventions were less bad and were leavened somewhat by the gold standard. In any event they were replaced by the Fed, which I rate as the single worst U.S. government institution ever. And since 1971, when the dollar's last link to gold was severed, inflation has galloped compared to the previous decades. Wilson's "civil" liberties record was probably as bad as Abe's, if not worse. If it wasn't as bad, it certainly wasn't far behind.
Wilson had other interventions as well, such as the FTC (I think that was created under Wilson).
So I would join Jim Powell in ranking Wilson as worse than Lincoln.
Other contenders who presided over the creation of the permanent bureacracy/thugcrockracy would include TR; Hoover (I suppose his interventionist bent against the depression counts as one big package, even though the RFC is long gone); FDR (New Deal institutions, especially Social Security); Truman (cold war author, containment doctrine, Department of Defense, snd some domestic institutions); LBJ (Great Society, including the Medicare/Medicaid rules and bureaucracy--was this his worst?); etc.
This things barely scratch the surface.