Herbert Spencer versus the Undead

by Liberty and Power

[cross-posted at Austro-Athenian Empire]

The lies about Herbert Spencer just won't die. Like creatures in a horror movie, no matter how many times you kill them they just keep coming back. The latest recycled slander against the valiant old libertarian turns up in Susan Jacoby's Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism; for one more try with the mallet and stake, see my reply here.

In other news: on LRC today, Pat Buchanan writes:"Since Henry Wallace, then, 60 years ago, no vice president has been dumped." Um ... what about Gerald Ford dumping Rockefeller for Dole in 1976?

comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:

Kenneth R Gregg - 7/23/2004

It's quite clear that Spencer requires a good intellectual biography, updated, with current issues addressed as well. Here is a great intellectual figure that is a "must read" for every libertarian who is smeared, inaccurately described, lied about. He was a prolific, creative developer of ideas. His popular book, "Education" should still be required reading and is a foundational work on progressive education. He was a brilliant writer on epistemology and metaphysics often more akin to Ayn Rand than to any of the fellow writers of his time. A feminist who promoted intellectual territory for women--there are just so many directions that a modern biographer could take that it is more than surprising that this has not been taken on--it is a shame.
Stack's new biography of Thomas Hodgskin (a wonderful work, by the way), "Nature and Artifice," touches on Spencer's intellectual roots and provides a good introduction into the differences between Hodgskin (who was clearly influenced by the Scottish Enlightenment philosophers) and Spencer's.
Just a thought.
Ken Gregg
kgregglv@cox.net
http://classicalliberalism.blogspot.com/

David M Fitzsimons - 7/23/2004

>>Pat Buchanan writes: "Since Henry Wallace, then, 60 years ago, no vice president has been dumped." Um ... what about Gerald Ford dumping Rockefeller for Dole in 1976?<<

There is much to disagree with in the Buchanan piece, but this is somewhat picky. Buchanan was surely aware of the NR decision--perhaps even involved in it, but he probably meant to say that HW was the first *elected* VP to be dumped in recent times.