Blogs > Liberty and Power > Tax Changes and the Housing Boom

Dec 22, 2008

Tax Changes and the Housing Boom




Several economists have started to focus on Clinton's 1997 Taxpayer Relief Act as a source of the housing boom. It allowed people to avoid capital gains on home price appreciation without having to rollover the gains into a bigger house. See the article in the New York Times of December 19 and Russ Roberts' post at Cafe Hayek.

The good news about this factor is that it gets the timing right for the beginning of the housing boom, unlike the attempt to pin the blame on Greenspan's monetary policy. The bad news, as Mark Brady has pointed out, is that U.S. tax changes can only explain the U.S. housing boom and not the European housing booms. Moreover, it can only explain a boom and not a bubble. A tax change should cause a real appreciation in home values that is permanent (until the exemption is repealed), not self-reversing. But then again, that should help prevent real housing prices from returning to their 1997 level.

Hat Tip: Warren Gibson


comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Jeffrey Rogers Hummel - 12/23/2008

Thanks! I'd overlooked that.


Lee C Waaks - 12/23/2008

Robert Murphy does reference the tax cut in his Mises article, "Did the Fed, or Asian Saving, Cause the Housing Bubble." He writes: "It's true, the housing boom started earlier than Greenspan's infamous rate cuts; from the graph it looks to have started in about 1996 or 1997. But that is also precisely when President Clinton exempted owner-occupied homes from capital-gains taxes (for the first $500,000), and so it's no wonder that these particular assets saw their prices rising at that point."