Blogs > Liberty and Power > History of the Government-Printed Ballot

Oct 11, 2008

History of the Government-Printed Ballot




The October 13, 2008, issue of THE NEW YORKER had an outstanding article by Harvard historian Jill Lepore detailing how American elections evolved from voice voting to the current "Australian" ballot, printed by the government, and the consequent decline in voter turnout. (Unfortunately the article is not yet available online.) Those interested in further elaboration on how Progressive era reforms made U.S. elections far less representative, see the excellent Mark Lawrence Kornbluh, WHY AMERICA STOPPED VOTING: THE DECLINE OF PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY AND THE EMERGENCE OF MODERN AMERICAN POLITICS (New York: NYU Press, 2000). Contrary to the implications of Bryan Caplan's MYTH OF THE RATIONAL VOTER and the impressions of many libertarians, government policies--at least in the U.S.--were at their most libertarian when voter turnout was highest.


comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Bill Courtney - 10/14/2008

Here's the url, Jeff:

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/10/13/081013fa_fact_lepore?currentPage=all


Russell Hanneken - 10/12/2008

Caplan's book implies that less turnout yields better policy only when all other things are equal. He doesn't say voter turnout is the only factor determining government policies.

A lot of things have changed over the course of American history. Maybe people today simply hate liberty more than they did in the days when voter turnout was higher.


David T. Beito - 10/11/2008

You are absolutely right. Turn-out of eligible voters was extremely high during the Grover Cleveland era. Paul Kleppner's Continuity and Change is a very good source on the Australian Ballot and progressive era ballot reforms. Murray Rothbard recommended that book to me!

http://www.amazon.ca/Continuity-Change-Electoral-Politics-1893-1928/dp/0313240698


Matthieu Gues - 10/11/2008

A little note to deride the fact that you have your name attached to the comment, but not your email adress. I thought the whole point of not showing the email was keeping some privacy, not being recognizable by the first schmuck reading this. Certainly, one can be recognized and penalized through other means, in case there's wrongdoing. So what is this about...?

Anyhoo, you got to include a link asap.