My colleague, Tim Burke, hosted the longest discussion we've had at Cliopatria with his post,
"Twizzle Twazzle Twozzle Twome", about our reactions to the abuses at Abu Ghraib. That discussion led to his subsequent post,
"What The Polls Can't Tell You", which has had much less attention. Public opinion polls, Burke suggests, have very limited utility for historians. At most, we tend to look on polling results as data to be viewed skeptically and used very critically. If that is true for us in even the most benign circumstances, our skepticism is enhanced with results arrived at in a nation under fire. Even so, it doesn't mean that polling results should be ignored.
A case in point are the results reported by the Iraq Center for Research and Strategic Studies. Its survey of 1600 representative Iraqis reports that over half of them now want allied occupying forces removed from Iraq, as compared with about one-fifth of them taking that position last October. Its report shows the radical young Shia Moqtada al-Sadr as having the strong support of about one-third of Iraqis. For thoughtful reflections on these reports, see Juan Cole and Daniel Drezner.
Meanwhile, there are increasing questions about the circumstances and authenticity of the videotape of the beheading of Nick Berg.