Blogs > Liberty and Power > USA Number One

Jul 10, 2008

USA Number One




A student in a class on the history of drugs was asked the following two questions; “Do more arrests and more people in prison necessarily lead to less drug use? Also, does a policy producing fewer arrests and less people in prison necessarily lead to more drug use?” Last week the World Health Organization (WHO) answered both queries with a resounding no.

Ever since the Progressive Era the United States government has pursued a policy relying primarily on punishment to curb drug abuse, with abuse and use being considered largely synonymous. While the program has always been a mixture of state coercion and drug treatment, the bulk of the funding has gone into maintaining prohibition. As a result, this country has a racially biased overcrowded prison system on the verge of collapse. We have a law enforcement system employing often very brutal tactics which accomplish very little in way of ending drug use. Our medical system is denying people in pain the medication they need to ease their suffering. And, the nation’s economic system must come up with billions of dollars each year to pay for this activity.

We are told these sacrifices are necessary to keep drugs in check but what do we really get for our money and our pain? Well, U.S. News and World Report, writing about research done by the WHO, tells us that the United States has “the highest percentage of people who reported using marijuana or cocaine at least once in their lives.” We have achieved this distinction despite the fact that many other countries have much more liberal and humane policies than us. Writing on AlterNetBruce Mirken argues that this study shows the punitive approach to be ineffective and that the people in charge of the policy know this. Mirken quotes the WHO researchers; "The U.S., which has been driving much of the world's drug research and drug policy agenda, stands out with higher levels of use of alcohol, cocaine, and cannabis, despite punitive illegal drug policies. ... The Netherlands, with a less criminally punitive approach to cannabis use than the US, has experienced lower levels of use, particularly among younger adults. Clearly, by itself, a punitive policy towards possession and use accounts for limited variation in nation level rates of illegal drug use."

Cross posted on The Trebach Report



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Keith Halderman - 7/13/2008

If in both countries 20 % of the people use illegal drugs then it does not matter how many different kinds of drugs are illegal. Just because a population is using a greater variety of drugs does not mean they are using more drugs. If a person eats three cinnamon donuts and another person eats a cinnamon donut, a chocolate donut, and a raspberry donut that does not mean that the second person ate more donuts. What matters is that 20% of the people are defying prohibition. I would suggest that if you have 20% of the people defying a law then the problem is not with the people but rather with the law.

Your link did not work and that is not surprising considering that it is a government website, so I do not know what it says. I do know that there are far more complaints about Dutch drug policy from the American government then there are from the Dutch government or the Dutch people. Also, the very small income differential between Holland and the USA is not going to a factor. It is not as though we are comparing America to Chad.

When the report says, "countries with stringent user-level illegal drug policies did not have lower levels of use than countries with liberal ones" that is not an oxymoron that is a fact because at the end of the day it is drug prohibition that glamorizes drug use.


Frank G Zavisca - 7/12/2008

From a real expert in crime:

This essay is bogus. It is replete with half-truths and mischaracterizations all designed to deceive people.

The drug use in the Netherlands did not decrease after decriminalization. Here is the link:

www.usdoj.gov/dea/demand/speakout/09so.htm+drug+use+in+Netherlands+since+legalization&">http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:-UvHDaRD1P4J:www.usdoj.gov/dea/demand/speakout/09so.htm+drug+use+in+Netherlands+since+legalization&;hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us


Furthermore the report stated: "the US having the highest levels of both legal and illegal drug use among all countries surveyed." It also went on to say that " higher income was related to drug use of all kinds" then it followed with this oxymoron, " countries with stringent user-level illegal drug policies did not have lower levels of use than countries with liberal ones."

If a country which has decriminalized drug use as the same level of illegal drug use than a country where drug use is criminalized does that not suggest that the decriminalization has not worked. If the Netherlands has the same percentage of illegal drug users than the US, despite the fact that they have less illegal drugs that suggests more drug use not less.

Nation A outlaws 10 different substances
Nation B five different substances
A and B both have 20% of their people using illegal drugs.

That indicates more not less. This study is nothing more than tendentious scholarship.

Michael P. Tremoglie


Keith Halderman - 7/11/2008

Well said.


Anthony Gregory - 7/10/2008

It has created a police state, and has conditioned the American people to tolerate severe violations of their civil liberties. Without the drug war, there would have been more resistance to the war on terror. Prohibition has brought about the largest prison system on earth. All successes for the state.

If the drug war was meant to create a drug free America, of course it has failed. But I increasingly doubt its purpose is anything other than totalitarianism.