Blogs > Liberty and Power > Media Manipulation and Environmentalism

Jun 24, 2008

Media Manipulation and Environmentalism




Critics of markets often argue that corporations manipulate images, both still and moving, to"trick" buyers into purchasing their products. Of course, in the market, if said products don't deliver, buyers have alternatives.

Not so in politics, where such manipulation is plentiful as well and where the decisions of the state give us no alternatives.

In my post yesterday, I mentioned NASA scientist James Hansen's Torquemada impersonation in his call to try oil executives for crimes against humanity. This morning, I read an account over on Planet Gore of Hansen's first testimony on global warming 20 years ago and the way in which several members of Congress and staff manipulated the visual scene to create support for Hansen's testimony. Here's an excerpt from the account linked above:

Specifically, the PBS series Frontline aired a special in April 2007 that lifted the curtain on the sort of illusions that politicians and their abettors employed to kick off the campaign.

Frontline interviewed key players in the June 1988 Senate hearing at which then-Senator Al Gore rolled out the official conversion from panic over “global cooling” to global warming alarmism. Frontline interviewed Gore’s colleague, then-Sen. Tim Wirth (now running Ted Turner’s UN Foundation). Comforted by the friendly nature of the PBS program, Wirth freely admitted the clever scheming that went into getting the dramatic shot of scientist James Hansen mopping his brow amid a sweaty press corps. An admiring Frontline termed this “Stagecraft.”

Sen. TIMOTHY WIRTH (D-CO), 1987-1993: We knew there was this scientist at NASA, you know, who had really identified the human impact before anybody else had done so and was very certain about it. So we called him up and asked him if he would testify.

DEBORAH AMOS: On Capitol Hill, Sen. Timothy Wirth was one of the few politicians already concerned about global warming, and he was not above using a little stagecraft for Hansen's testimony.

TIMOTHY WIRTH: We called the Weather Bureau and found out what historically was the hottest day of the summer. Well, it was June 6th or June 9th or whatever it was. So we scheduled the hearing that day, and bingo, it was the hottest day on record in Washington, or close to it.

DEBORAH AMOS: [on camera] Did you also alter the temperature in the hearing room that day?

TIMOTHY WIRTH: What we did is that we went in the night before and opened all the windows, I will admit, right, so that the air conditioning wasn't working inside the room. And so when the- when the hearing occurred, there was not only bliss, which is television cameras and double figures, but it was really hot.[Shot of witnesses at hearing]

WIRTH: Dr. Hansen, if you’d start us off, we’d appreciate it. The wonderful Jim Hansen was wiping his brow at the table at the hearing, at the witness table, and giving this remarkable testimony.[nice shot of a sweaty Hansen]

JAMES HANSEN: [June 1988 Senate hearing] Number one, the earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe, with a high degree of confidence, a cause-and-effect relationship to the greenhouse effect.

Next time someone accuses capitalists of using manipulative images to persuade people to buy something, you might bring this little incident up and point out that at least we have choices in the market.


comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Gus diZerega - 7/2/2008

Sometimes something just has to be labeled for what it is. What I responded to was itself a dishonest or ignorant slur without connection to any valid evidence. Not Steve's point, but the specific comment I attacked in the quote.

The right wing pretty consistently prefers slurs and distortion to reasoned argument. Anyone who has read my posts on the global warming issue will know there is plenty of reasoned debate in them. But why waste my time debating lies and slurs?

Even then, I backed up my claim with evidence, which you seem to have ignored.


John Olerud - 7/1/2008

That phrase doesn't remind me of reasoned debate for some reason. I wonder if scientists ever did figure out what caused and ended the Little Ice Age that struck Europe? Wikipedia doesn't have a definitive explanation for that. I checked.


Gus diZerega - 6/25/2008

The comment in the article about global cooling is a load of crap. Stuff like that is a major reason I now pay little attention to anything from the right on this issue. They want to win the argument and don't care about the evidence.

I remember reading that some scientists were concerned we might be entering a new ice age some decades ago. It was never - I repeat never - a major issue in the scientific community. As I remember the longest discussion, which I read, was in New Scientist.

According to wikipedia during the 70s about 10% of the papers looking at climate trends suggested we were in for prolonged cooling and most papers predicted warming.

I believe wikipedia on this issue.