More Noted ...
Update: Ophelia Benson's Butterflies and Wheels, Scott McLemee, and Eugene Volokh have links to Smallwood's article about Invisible Adjunct.
Over at No Loss for Words, Danny Loss finds two words that may not be in the historian's vocabulary: inevitable and timeless.
I am disappointed by academics who sign their names to op-eds ghost-written for them. I do not share their sense of outrage when those same op-eds appear elsewhere with other academics' names signed to them. I take some comfort, frankly, when said academics feel betrayed when they find that the ghost-writer is also a plagiarist (scroll down to 09-04-03). I am disappointed when academic colleagues and administrators wink and shrug it off as inconsequential. Robert Tagorda at Priorities & Frivolities and Kevin Drum at Political Animal have more thoughts on the matter. Writers for History News Service, like Jonathan Dresner and I, can tell you that we don't do astro-turf op-eds. By the time we have jumped through the rewrite hoops for Joyce Appleby and Jim Banner, the work is certainly freshly our own. Then, there was the time when a term paper service tried to offer HNS op-eds for sale to our students. Appropriate steps have been taken to see that it doesn't happen again.
Update: Erin O'Connor's Critical Mass and Juan Non-Volokh have more on this issue.
There was a considerable dust-up in the blogosphere's Left lobe over the weekend about its attitude toward religious believers. It began with Atrios and was picked up by Allen Brill's The Village Gate and Kevin Drum's Political Animal (with lots of links). It's obviously a difficult issue, but somewhere between the obligation of progressive believers to call the religious right's corruption and the secular left's obligation not to alienate religious citizens deliberately, there has to be a way for the religious and secular left to articulate and support a common vision.
I cannot explain why Cliopatria ranks #3 in a googlesearch for fink's+fall+show+pigs+2004.