Blogs > Liberty and Power > Is It All about Oil?

Oct 15, 2007

Is It All about Oil?




Jim Holt considers the reasons why the U.S. invaded and occupied Iraq and has no intention of leaving anytime soon.

"Iraq is 'unwinnable', a 'quagmire', a 'fiasco': so goes the received opinion. But there is good reason to think that, from the Bush-Cheney perspective, it is none of these things. Indeed, the US may be 'stuck' precisely where Bush et al want it to be, which is why there is no 'exit strategy'."

"The costs – a few billion dollars a month plus a few dozen American fatalities (a figure which will probably diminish, and which is in any case comparable to the number of US motorcyclists killed because of repealed helmet laws) – are negligible compared to $30 trillion in oil wealth, assured American geopolitical supremacy and cheap gas for voters. In terms of realpolitik, the invasion of Iraq is not a fiasco; it is a resounding success.

"Still, there is reason to be sceptical of the picture I have drawn: it implies that a secret and highly ambitious plan turned out just the way its devisers foresaw, and that almost never happens."


comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Mark Brady - 10/15/2007

Whatever Jim Holt's views on helmet laws may be, we can't dismiss his essay on the reasons behind the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq so easily. I encourage readers to evaluate the arguments in his article on their own merits.


Gary McGath - 10/15/2007

Holt apparently regards people as helpless idiots who are unable to make their own choices in the absence of helmet laws, and thus are "killed" by the absence of those laws. This doesn't give him much credibility on any issue of people's motivation.