Have Ayn Rand, Will Not Travel
"Tenure Shrugged: A Scholar's Affinity for the Philosophy of Ayn Rand Cost Him His Job"
History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.
The opening statement in the Chronicle article on my tenure case, regarding civilian deaths, is inaccurate on two counts. First, this had nothing to do with the tenure decision. The George Mason University remarks were made seven months after my application for tenure, nealy four months after the denial, and hours after I resigned in exchange for tenure and promotion. Such remarks were never mentioned, either verbally or in writing, as part of the denial.
The second inaccuracy is in their relation to my own views. My statement was part of my opposition to the use of any religion for political purposes of any kind. The separation of church and state--and strident opposition to theocratic governments of all types--is my central position.
No thinking person would speak of civilian deaths in such a cavalier manner. The writer of the article inferred this--which is why he did not quote me as saying such. I did not even call for *military* action against Iran. I do maintain that the US must confront, and destroy, its theocratic government, if there is to be an end to terror attacks world-wide. But a groundswell of intellectual opposition to this illiberal regime, for instance, could be very effective in accomplishing this without the horror of massive civilian casualties.
Whatever one's own position, the matter requires careful thought, not flippant opinions, sloppily formulated.
John Lewis
Chris, that CHE link is password-only. Do you have a free link or a pdf by any chance?
The Chronicle of Higher Education has more coverage on Rand's academic legacy in its 13 July 2007 issue. See here and my Notablog entry here.
This story is incredible. I can't believe that Ashland denied Lewis tenure.
Doesn't the libertarian John Moser teach in the same dept. as Lewis at Ashland. I wonder what role Moser played in all of this? You have to hope that Moser led the charge in defending Lewis.
Thanks!
Don't worry an "incident" will be created when the time is right.
Her views are somewhat hard to disentangle, as Prof. Long notes --
http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/21422.html
Not only that but just exactly when did Iran attack us?
Is the claim that Rand didn't care too much about civilian deaths accurate? The author of the article seems to take this on faith. I know that Rand could be pretty hawkish at times but never heard that she held such a view. Ragnar wasn't a baby killer!