Blogs > Cliopatria > Boycott DePaul

Jun 15, 2007

Boycott DePaul




Finkelstein's tenure denial rankles badly those of us determined to keep our visions of activist-scholarship intact in our academic careers. Are we to remain hostage to invested groups turning the screws on the 'controversy-shy' administration? Never. DePaul students and faculty are rallying around to protest and being threatened with expulsions and arrests - this cannot be tolerated.

Finkelstein is not the first academic to be denied tenure for holding beliefs contrary to the mainstream [liberal or conservative] and he won't be the last. I am also certain that he will find a new home, soon. However, we must, as academics, make sure that the pressure we exert on the University administrations to respect academic freedoms be equal or greater than the pressure exerted by groups to silence such voices from public discourses. You can read some letters being written to Finkelstein and judge the amount of outrage on this decision. I am posting below a letter being circulated by faculty across the US and international academic circles ... if you wish to be a signatory, please click and send an email. I have and I intend on following through.


Mr. John Simon, Chair
Board of Trustees
DePaul University

Dear Mr. Simon:

We, the undersigned, deplore the process used by the administration of DePaul University to deny tenure to Professor Norman Finkelstein and Professor Mehren Larudee. We are prepared to take the necessary steps to make sure that DePaul, as an institution, is held accountable for its violations of the principles of academic freedom.

Professor Finkelstein's scholarship has made him internationally known as an expert in his field. His five books have been published by universally-respected presses and have been translated into eighteen languages. Such an intellectual output, by a scholar applying for tenure at the level of associate professor, is far and beyond even the most stringent requirements of the most elite institutions in the United States. His teaching, as even his detractors acknowledge, has received the highest praise from his students and colleagues. His qualifications for tenure and promotion at an institution such as DePaul should not even be open to question.

The process by which Professor Finkelstein was denied tenure represents a clear violation of the principles of faculty governance and of the most basic principles of academic freedom. Professor Finkelstein,s departmental committee voted 9 to 3 in support of granting him tenure, and a five-member college-level personnel committee then voted unanimously in favor of tenure. These were the key decision-makers, and their preference was clear. It was only at this point that the dean of Professor Finkelstein,s college wrote a memorandum recommending against tenure, on the basis of a consideration that was not even a stated part of the tenure process.

The case of Professor Larudee is equally distressing. Professor Larudee, an assistant professor of international studies, was unanimously approved for tenure by her departmental committee and by the college-level personnel committee, and was even supported by the same college dean who opposed Professor Finkelstein's tenure. We fear that the only reason why Professor Larudee was subsequently denied tenure, even after receiving overwhelming approval from the relevant faculty committees, was due to her outspoken support of Professor Finkelstein.

"Academic freedom is alive and well at DePaul"? President Dennis Holtschneider declared, as part of the official statement announcing the decision to deny tenure to Professor Finkelstein. But it is not for the DePaul administration to make such a judgment; it is, in fact, the larger academic community, of which we are all members, which must judge the state of academic freedom at DePaul. In our judgment, DePaul is in grave violation of the principles of academic freedom.

Therefore, we, the undersigned, declare our intention to hold the administration of DePaul University accountable for its violations of academic freedom. Accordingly, we hereby pledge:

1. We will refuse to participate in, attend, or support any conferences or other activities sponsored by DePaul University, and will encourage our colleagues to follow suit.

2. We will, to the best of our abilities, prevent our institutions from collaborating with DePaul University on any conferences or other activities, and will urge our institutions to refuse to take part in any joint activities or exchange programs with the university.

3. We will urge our colleagues and students not to apply for any academic programs or job openings at DePaul University.

4. We will urge those professional bodies and associations of which we are members to censure DePaul University, and to apply the appropriate penalties against the institution.

5. We will contact the alumni of DePaul University and urge them to withhold contributions from the university.

It should be noted that none of these actions are aimed at individual faculty members or students at DePaul. Indeed, many members of the faculty and the student body have consistently supported Professors Finkelstein and Larudee. The decision to deny tenure in these cases was the result of a completely undemocratic process that undermined the principles of faculty governance and academic freedom at DePaul, and our actions are an attempt to move the university administration to honor these important principles.

The university administration must begin a process by which the original faculty decisions to grant tenure to Professors Finkelstein and Larudee are honored. This process must also insure that such violations of academic freedom are not repeated. Under these circumstances, we will be happy to once again consider DePaul University as an institution that honors the important principles to which we are all dedicated. Until such a time, however, we urge our colleagues, students, and other members of the intellectual community to cease business as usual with DePaul University.

Sincerely,

(To sign this letter, please send an email with your name and any academic, professional, or other affiliation to) The Undersigned



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Peter N. Kirstein - 6/19/2007

The purpose of a boycott is to cause change in the behaviour of the boycotted. I think sometimes boycotts that are intended to protest the sanctioning or censoring of speech, may contribute to the very "evil" they wish to challenge. While I am not in principle opposed to all boycotts, I think in the area of education they stifle and not enhance free expression.

We shall see how aggressively the statement is promulgated.


Manan Ahmed - 6/17/2007

In fact, this was sent to me by several current DePaul faculty - and I know them personally. The signatures are also being collected and will be released shortly.


Peter N. Kirstein - 6/17/2007

I expressed several days ago privately my opinions with an "enabler" of the above statement. I expressed concern about utilising boycotts to achieve academic freedom. Yet my understanding, which may be erroneous, is that the statement is is not being aggressively circulated by any of the principals or by any DePaul University faculty member.


Jeff Vanke - 6/16/2007

Sounds very plausible. Were I an activist Finkelstein detractor, though, I would certainly have tried to get attention at various levels between Rome and DePaul.


Brandon Scott Watson - 6/15/2007

Jeff,

What would be surprising would be if anyone in the Vatican even knew who Finkelstein was. Direct interventions of U.S. bishops into Catholic colleges are rare and of the Vatican are even rarer; in the latter case, the Congregations that are capable of intervening in any way at all are not extensively staffed and thus have sharp limits to what they can handle at one time. So Sobrino and Gutierrez, being significant and important theologians, would merit the extensive examination Ratzinger gave them under JPII. It's hard to see how Finkelstein would even come up.

We don't have to look to some episcopal conspiracy to find the probable cause; ideological conflicts between administration and faculty are fairly common at Catholic colleges without any external intervention.


Peter N. Kirstein - 6/15/2007

Professor Finkelstein's most recent book, Beyond Chutzpah, which challenged Alan Dershowitz's, The Case for Israel, was published by the University of California Press. One might wish to consult a variety of sources that detail his rather hefty list of publications including an article with the Georgetown University Law Review.


Ralph E. Luker - 6/15/2007

Mr. Rotenstreich, You apparently have no regard for your own reputation for truthfulness. Your own zeal in denying that Finkelstein has any published academic work is ludicrous.


samuel rotenstreich - 6/15/2007

Finkelstein's views are not a factor is the tenure issue. His corpus of work is zilch. As for his views, it is not uncommon for people to hate themselves. The converts to Islam who call for Jihad on Christians, the Jewish guy who headed a branch of the KKK, the Jewish Neocons with the political views that fly in the face of a two centuries of Jewish social activism.

Jewish history is replete with Finklestein look a likes.


samuel rotenstreich - 6/15/2007

Granting tenure for less work than nothing seems impossible by definition. Furthermore, many cheat on their taxes, however, that's not much of an excuse when you're caught.

Are we in the business of supporting academic bums? What kind of an example are we setting for future generations.


Jeff Vanke - 6/15/2007

Finkelstein is problematic, and I hesitate to endorse his corpus of scholarship, because I am not obsessed enough to go back and forth between his and Dershowitz's websites.

(That's Alan "If I did it, here's how it happened" Dershowitz. As long as their debate is so ad hominem, how come I'm only reading about Finkelstein's alleged self-loathing anti-Semitism, and not Dershowitz's whatever we want to call his jumping on board the OJ defense?)

In my moderate following of the Finkelstein case, I haven't read anything to suggest intervention from the Roman Catholic hierarchy. That's surprising. Pope Benedict helped his predecessor shut out theological dissent from Catholic universities worldwide. It's worth pondering the Vatican's perspective in the Finkelstein case, though I have no hypotheses to suggest, beyond a possible Vatican desire to avoid further controversy on Holocaust issues.


Jeff Vanke - 6/15/2007

Reviews are academic work. Many institutions grant tenure for much less than Finkelstein has done, including, it seems, DePaul.


samuel rotenstreich - 6/14/2007

Finklestein has published no academic work. Tenure is awarded for a mixture of teaching, service and academic contribution. Institutions such as DePaul are research and teaching institutions; granting tenure to a person lacking publication is a travesty.

DePaul decision can, therefore, be fully justified.

As much as I despise Finklestein's self hate, screed and racial attitude, had he published anything, I would agree with granting him tenure and support him if he would've been denied one.

As it stands, Finklestein is repeating the "Protocols of the Elder of Zion" and as such he doesn't belong in academia.


Nonpartisan - 6/14/2007

While I'm posting the letter at my site in an effort to raise awareness (It'll go up Saturday), I can't in good consciousness sign it myself. Though I oppose the firing of Professor Finkelstein, I object strenuously to Point Number Five in the letter's pledge:


5. We will contact the alumni of DePaul University and urge them to withhold contributions from the university.

Protesting the decision is all well and good, but Point Number Five will actually kill the university if it's carried out, damaging the future careers of all current faculty and students at the school. in protest of a single bad tenure decision, I think that action is extreme and unwarranted.


Ralph M. Hitchens - 6/14/2007

Long ago in my youth, before I embarked on a career as a pilot, I read Ernest K. Gann's excellent memoir "Fate Is The Hunter." For some reason, reading about Dr. Finkelstein lately in the blogosphere brought this book to mind.