Blogs > Liberty and Power > A World-Class Thug

Apr 18, 2007

A World-Class Thug




From The Times 10th April 2007: "US officials are reaching across borders in an attempt to prevent companies doing business in countries such as Iran, even if people are obeying their own domestic laws."

"Ali Manzarpour, a Brighton-based businessman, is in jail in Poland awaiting extradition to the United States, despite never having visited the country. He is charged with trying to export an experimental single-engine aircraft to Iran. This is not believed to have contravened any British or European law, but because the aircraft originated in the US, the Americans are claiming jurisdiction.

[….]
Cases being brought by the US Department of Commerce against companies breaching export rules indicate that, apart from rare cases, such as that of ITT, nearly all involve small operations. Companies such as Shell, which is planning a £5 billion liquid natural gas venture in Iran, and Halliburton, which had an office in Tehran for years, appear to be of less concern to authorities in Washington than an individual allegedly attempting to sell a light aircraft.
--------
Mr Manzarpour was arrested in Poland in February 2005. Questions were raised in the
House of Lords on the 26th February & then the 30th March 2006. Members were furious at the Americans’ ‘excessive demands’, especially since Mr Manzarpour could not have been extradited from Britain, where his activities were perfectly legal:

Lord Goodhart : My Lords, is this not an example of the US Government's aggressive use of the powers to obtain extradition and of the submission by too many countries—including, in other cases, our own—to those excessive demands?
[…..]
Lord Waddington: My Lords, is it not correct that, in exporting the goods to Iran from Britain, Mr Manzarpour broke no British law and, if he had remained in Britain, there would have been no question of his being extradited to the United States? If that be correct, why are we not protesting vigorously to the American authorities at their attempt to have Mr Manzarpour sent to America from Poland to stand trial for acts that took place in Britain and that were not contrary to our law?
------------
Every empire in world history has had definite borders within which its writ ran. If its armies crossed those borders it was at least in defence of those borders. Only the US govt has so arrogantly claimed jurisdiction over a foreign national, whose actions all occurred in a foreign country, where those actions were completely legal. And only the single hapless individual is thus pursued. This is just simple bullying -- on a world scale.



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Sudha Shenoy - 4/18/2007

I've now tried to indicate the words of The Times a bit more distinctly.


Sudha Shenoy - 4/18/2007

I'm sorry, but that was _The Times_ referring to an 'experimental airplane'. You will note the first words were: 'From The Times..' The first, second, & third paras were quotes. I'm sorry the quotation marks _were_ indistinct, but I don't know how to cure that.


Andrew D. Todd - 4/18/2007

I should like to clarify on one point. You use the term "experimental airplane" to describe a Berkut 360. To an uninformed reader, this would suggest a level of technological sophistication which is at variance with the facts. In American aviation law, "experimental airplane" is what the lawyers call a "term of art." Typically it means a small, simple, inexpensive airplane sold in kit form to hobbyists, sometimes called a "homebuilt." There are regulations about the amount of work the manufacturer may do, with the intent of requiring the buyer to actually put a good deal of his own handiwork into building the airplane. The Federal Aviation Administration feels that someone who simply buys an airplane is more likely to fly it in a reckless fashion, as opposed to someone who actually wields a wrench. These regulations are evaded to a certain extent. There are certain significant restrictions on the use of such airplanes, to prevent innocent bystanders from being flown around in an airplane which has not passed the usual industrial safety tests. The term "experimental" derived from the idea that an amateur inventor would design and build his own airplane. However, in practice, there are almost no "experimental" airplanes which are not kits.

http://archive.theargus.co.uk/2005/5/10/102896.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkut_360