Blogs > Cliopatria > Wednesday Notes

Mar 28, 2007

Wednesday Notes




On Sunday 1 April, Mary Beard will host History Carnival 51 at A Don's Life. Nominate the best in history blogging since 15 March in comments there, by e-mail at mb127*at*cam*dot *ac*dot*uk, or by using the form.

Jonathan Yardley,"Why are we so Fascinated by the Lives of Others?" Washington Post, 25 March, reviews Nigel Hamilton's Biography: A Brief History. See also: Hamilton's"Life Studies," Boston Globe, 25 March. Thanks to Manan Ahmed for the tips.

"Sex in the 1700s," Scientific Blogging, 24 March, reports on the research of Jenny Skipp at the University of Leeds. She argues that erotic literature was widely available in 18th century England and that it had a literary quality and sense of humor not often found in that of our own time. Hat tip.

Already, you can pre-order: Stuart Taylor and KC Johnson, Until Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Injustices of the Duke Lacrosse Case (Thomas Dunne Books, September 2007). You go, KC!

Rick Shenkman's"The Storm Facing Tulane's History Department," HNN, 27 March, breaks a story about a department's internal warfare. As if recovery from Katrina hadn't been challenge enough ....

Darrin McMahon,"Europe, Economics, and History," Open University, 27 March, invites a discussion about the European economy. More, it asks us to consider the fate of economic history. In many places, economics departments or, even Business Schools, have taken history departments' responsibility for it. Eric Rauchway's"Where Are the Economic Historians?" OU, 27 March, is a particularly strong reply on that point. Has the AHA's Employment Information Bulletin advertised positions in economic history in the last twenty years?

The question goes beyond departmental teaching slots. McMahon recalls only a single paper in economic history at the last AHA convention. A good place to begin looking at the state of economic history is EH.Net. It offers abstracts, bibliographies, a conference calendar, reviews, syllabi, and a directory of members of the Business History Conference, the Cliometric Society, and the Economic History Association. One reason for the lack of economic history papers at the AHA convention is that these groups do not meet in conjunction with it. Of the three major economic history societies, only the EHA is affiliated with the AHA and even it does not sponsor sessions at the AHA convention.



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Robert B Townsend - 3/28/2007

I've wondered about the same issue. Last year, out of the 1,030 jobs listed with the AHA only 2 were for economic history. Buried in an article I did on faculty field specializations over the past 30 years (at http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2007/0701/0701new1.cfm) I found that the proportion of economic historians listed in the directly, and the number of departments employing them, fell sharply over the past 30 years. My assumption is that if you can do the math you would probably want to go to a department where you can be paid accordingly.


Mary Dudziak - 3/28/2007

There is good economic history being done by legal historians, including strong junior scholars. Just one example is Claire Priest's recent article in the Harvard Law Review, CREATING AN AMERICAN PROPERTY LAW: ALIENABILITY AND ITS LIMITS IN AMERICAN HISTORY, http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/120/dec06/priest.shtml. Abstracts of working papers in this area are posted on SSRN (Social Science Recearch Network). New SSRN papers (of all kinds -- not just econ. history, and not just US history) are regularly featured on the Legal History Blog. http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/