Blogs > Cliopatria > Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. , 1917-2007

Mar 1, 2007

Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. , 1917-2007




The Pulitzer-Prize winning historian Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., has died at 89.

Schlesinger, Jr. was known by the general public primarily for his staunch liberalism and his work in the Kennedy White House, along with such famous books as A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House. Graduate students of my generation, though, knew him not as a famous historian of the recent past, but as the historian who first shaped our understanding of Jacksonian America with his marvelous first book, The Age of Jackson (1945). Though this book has been much revised (and sometimes much maligned), it is still the starting point for any scholar who wishes to understand Jacksonian America. It is also, aside from its scholarly value, a beautifully written book.

I also think Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. can still serve as a model for how historians can do excellent scholarship but still write for a broader audience and engage in public service. I can't think of any historians now who serve in a similar capacity.



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Rebecca Anne Goetz - 3/5/2007

Too much beer? Too much baseball? ;)


Manan Ahmed - 3/3/2007

My scholarship shows no sign of improving despite my abstinence from the NY and DC parties circuit. I wonder if something else might be wrong?


Rebecca Anne Goetz - 3/2/2007

I just got an email from an old buddy telling me that Schlesinger's real problem was not his position as "court historian" but the fact that he was just so social...as my friend put it, he spent too much time at parties and not enough time writing.

I suppose I'm inclined to like Schlesinger because The Age of Jackson is such an important and wonderful book. Could his scholarship on the Kennedys have been better? Sure, and he himself has said as much. I'm sure there is much to admire in his life and work, and much to quibble with.


Alan Allport - 3/1/2007

Doesn't Schlesinger's career represent exactly why scholarship and public service aren't a good mixture? Correct me if I'm wrong, but surely the only role he played at Camelot was as an elegant but ultimately ephemeral piece of the decor (and later its house apologist).


Ralph E. Luker - 3/1/2007

... Wasn't Schlesinger the very embodiment of the "court historian" -- hungering to be near the centers of power and willing to be their spokesperson, as needed? It seems to me that he's of no help to us at all when it comes to issues like executive power, because he was all for its expansion when the executive was one he favored and who favored him and he was all hyper-critical of it when the executive was one he opposed and who didn't favor him.