Blogs > Liberty and Power > Simon Jenkins on the Hypocrisy of Jack Straw

Oct 8, 2006

Simon Jenkins on the Hypocrisy of Jack Straw




As some of you may be aware, last week Jack Straw, a senior member of the Labour government, called for Moslem women in Britain to discard the burqa. Straw was formerly Home Secretary and latterly Foreign Secretary, and is now Leader of the House of Commons. In other words, he has been an important member of the cabinet since Tony Blair became prime minister. In today's Sunday Times Simon Jenkins has written a perceptive column where he agrees with Straw's request but then explains how Shaw's exploitation of this topic is vulnerable to a number of hypocrisies.

"He and Blair took Britain to war. Straw has bought the full package, bombing Kabul and Baghdad, Guantanamo Bay, the return to Afghanistan and now a refusal to discuss withdrawal. He is a paid-up member of the pro-war cabinet.

"That the Iraq and Afghan wars have radicalised Muslim opinion against the West worldwide is a truism everywhere but in those citadels of denial, the White House and No 10. While the radicalising is most vociferous in the Middle East, its crypto-religious connotations have spilt over into Muslim communities everywhere. Antipathy is not just to the wars but also to the 'western values' in whose name they are being fought.

"The government’s claim that it is saving Muslims from their own worst selves and bringing them democracy is as patronising as it is implausible.

"Yet Straw believes it and last year vociferously declared that Muslim fanaticism in Britain 'has nothing whatever to do with the war'."


comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


N. Friedman - 10/11/2006

typo:

Please replace this sentence: "The allegations - evidently not a real event - led to the stirring up hatred among many Muslims. Etc., etc., etc."

Substitute:

The allegations - evidently not a real event - of flushing a copy the Koran down the toilet led to the stirring up hatred among many Muslims. Etc., etc., etc.


N. Friedman - 10/11/2006

The issue is not that the war in Iraq stirs up hatred among many Muslims. That is no doubt true. But, there was hatred long before Iraq. 9/11 was before Iraq. And that event led to celebrations among large numbers of Muslims - not all but, evidently, a lot - in both Muslim countries, Europe and even in the US. Recall that Mr. Rushdie's book The Satanic Verses led to stirring up hatred among Muslims - and quite a few people died in that hatefest -.

Further, the cartoon event stirred up hatred among large numbers of Muslims. The allegations - evidently not a real event - led to the stirring up hatred among many Muslims. Etc., etc., etc.

It seems to me that we cannot much worry about stirring up hatred among those who are looking for excuses - and sometimes real things - to hate. Iraq, whether a good idea or not - and I would say not - should be judged on its merits, not on whether it stirs up a mob of hate mongers. If it were not Iraq, it would be something else.

If we allow what amounts to a mob to control our actions and debate and thoughts, then we lose control of events even more than Bush has lost control of them. So, while I would not have gone into Iraq, I would not spend my time worrying what a mob of haters thinks.