Blogs > Liberty and Power > Redlining: A Legacy of FDR's New Deal

Mar 2, 2006

Redlining: A Legacy of FDR's New Deal




Critics of Franklin D. Roosevelt have blamed his administration for many sins: a prolonged depression, the creation of a federal welfare state that fostered dependence, establishment of the imperial presidency in foreign policy, Japanese internment, the Brown Scare, retrograde civil rights policies, etc. Only a few have emphasized, however, that Roosevelt was also the father (at least indirectly) of redlining.

Amy E. Hillier has a carefully researched article on the subject in a recent issue of Social Science History. Redlining is a practice of denying credit to certain neighborhoods because of their racial or ethnic composition. The origin of the term can be traced to the color-coded “Residential Security Maps” of major American cities produced by the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), a New Deal agency created in 1933. Each map had four different classifications ranging from most to least desirable: green, blue, yellow, and red.

Most desirable were the green areas. They were ethnically “"homogeneous” and worthy of loans in “good times or bad.” The second and third grade areas were blue and yellow. Least desirable were the red areas. According to the maps, they had “detrimental influences in a pronounced degree” and an “undesirable population [disproportionately black] or an infiltration of it.” During the late 1930s, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) used the maps as a basis for its loans. It rarely gave loans to red areas, hence the term redlining. The federal government provided the maps to banks and developers who often used them as a basis for their own loan ratings.



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


David T. Beito - 3/3/2006

I agree....though (as you indicate) these historians rarely emphasize this racism. They are more like to emphasize Eleanor's defense of civil rights (thus implicitly making FDR look better) even though, of course, she had no power.


David T. Beito - 3/3/2006

It was a typo on my part.


Mark Brady - 3/3/2006

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, it would seem not to be the case. The OED finds an author using "homogenous" only as far back as 1956. Webster provided both spellings in 1961.


David T. Beito - 3/3/2006

It is a very fast read and well worth it. I assigned it in my black history course and it worked well.


Keith Halderman - 3/3/2006

When I get off drug history and go back to black history that book wil be my first stop.


Anthony Gregory - 3/2/2006

Among the leftie historians I've heard speak on the issue, the complaint that the New Deal was utterly racist to blacks was actually common. Of course, the Japanese-interning, black-American-neglecting FDR still gets a pass: He saved America from the Depression, after all. Or, he gave Americans confidence during a hard time, or something like that. At the very least, his intentions were in the right place. Or, even if they weren't, he was, er, um — well, even America's greatest deities have their flaws. But without them we'd all be some unknown hell.


Roderick T. Long - 3/2/2006

Were people already writing "homogeneous" as "homogenous" back in 1933?


David T. Beito - 3/2/2006

Yes, I assign it. On the whole, however, I think David Bernstein's, Only One Place of Redress, is an even more devastating critique of New Deal racist policies.


Keith Halderman - 3/2/2006

Anyone interested in reading more about the negative effects of the New Deal with regards to Blacks should look at one of my favorite books, Farewell to the Party of Lincoln by Nancy Weiss.