Civil War Aims?
I just saw a C-span interview with William Styple, author of Generals in Bronze, which presents a fund of previously unknown interviews (by artist James Kelly) with various Civil War generals. It contains a lot of information that will apparently change many historians standard accounts of the war, but the point that most struck me was that two Union generals – Porter and Pleasonton – testified that the conditions to which Grant had to agree in order to receive command of the Army of the Potomac were that the war must not be ended until:
1. the South was crushed
2. slavery was abolished
3. Lincoln was re-elected
Point 2 seems to give grist to the mill of pro-Lincolnites (by suggesting that emancipation was part of the plan all along, not a last-minute war measure), while points 1 and 3 seem to give grist to the mill of anti-Lincolnites. Any comments from historians?