On Meritocracies ...
Ivy League Undergrads: Malcolm Gladwell,"Getting In: The Social Logic of Ivy League Admissions," New Yorker, 3 October, reviews Jerome Karabel's The Chosen. My favorite passage:
When the Office of Civil Rights at the federal education department investigated Harvard in the nineteen-eighties, they found handwritten notes scribbled in the margins of various candidates' files."This young woman could be one of the brightest applicants in the pool but there are several references to shyness," read one. Another comment reads,"Seems a tad frothy." One application -- and at this point you can almost hear it going to the bottom of the pile -- was notated,"Short with big ears."
Thanks to Jonathan Wilson at The Elfin Ethicist for the tip.
Fallen Historians: Alex Beam,"Doris Kearns Goodwin's Second Act," Boston Globe, 6 October, reflects, a little cynically, on the public relations campaign for Goodwin's new biography of Lincoln. He is as good a subject to redeem yourself with as I can imagine, though Lincoln didn't do anything to redeem Stephen Oates. Beam concludes:
Goodwin's publicity blitzkrieg includes a visit to ''The Daily Show." I would love to see Jon Stewart prop up her book on his desk, as he often does with authors, and then swivel his chair toward his guest, sitting demurely on the couch. In my imagination, Stewart asks: ''So, Doris, tell me -- how much of this did you write yourself?"
A man can dream, can't he?
Thanks to Hiram Hover for the tip.
Titled Professorships: So, you thought your department's round of on-campus interviews was a circus: There's a grand smackdown to decide who will become the Regius Professor of Classics at Cambridge in 1906. Peter Stothard's"Prof Idol," TLS, 6 October, reviews Christopher Stray, ed., The Owl of Minerva: The Cambridge Praelections of 1906 (Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 2005). [ ... ]
U. S. Supreme Court: David Greenberg,"Supreme Court Cronyism," Slate, 5 October, says that the Bush administration has rejected the Progressive Era's bureaucratic, meritristic, professional, and technocratic values in favor of the 19th century's spoils system. Thanks to Kevin Murphy at Ghost in the Machine for the tip. Charles Krauthammer,"Withdraw This Nominee," Washington Post, 7 October, puts it succinctly. The best place for primary and secondary sources on Harriet Miers is at The University of Michigan Law Library. Thanks to Orin Kerr and Jim Lindgren at The Volokh Conspiracy for the tips.