Welcome to Infinity, Limited
tags: technology,innovation,Coopersmith,invention
Welcome to Infinity, Limited
Doing the history of technology is like being a kid in a
candy store. There are so many possible
topics and so many ways of tackling them that the tempting opportunities seem
endless. This blog will explore that
candy store and try to convey some of the thrills that those of us fortunate
(or deluded) enough to be professional historians of technology
experience.
Infinity, Limited is this blog’s
name. Technology enables us to extend
ourselves in ways unimaginable ever a few decades ago. Our imaginations and expectations of what
technology can do are infinite, but the reality is limited by factors ranging
from the narrowly technical (materials unable to fulfill desired
specifications) to the economic (the best technology is worthless if too
costly) to the social (are pocket protectors really cool?). Hence “Infinity, Limited.”
Why should you read
this blog? After all, the Internet
offers millions of alternatives, often done more professionally and with more
provocative titles and images. First, the
history of technologies are fascinating in themselves. Second, the history of
technology offers windows into understanding larger historical issues. Third, the history of technology is fun. You’ll never look at your laundry the same
way before. Or the LED.
What is technology? I favor broad, inclusive definitions: Melvin Kranzberg, one of the founders of the
Society for the History of Technology (SHOT) and Carroll Pursell in 1967 wrote,
“Technology, in a sense, is nothing more than the area of interaction between
ourselves, as individuals, and our environment, whether material or spiritual,
natural or manmade.”[i] Two decades later, the editors of one of the
seminal books in the field defined technology as the set of “physical objects or artifacts,” “activities
or processes,” and “what people know as well as what they do.”[ii]
Technology is an instrument of culture
as well as individuals and always occurs within a particular social context.
Technologies are ways of extending control over nature
(including people). A B-2 bomber is a complex technology; an
umbrella is a simple technology. One is used to exert control militarily; the
other exerts control over (or minimizes the efforts of) the weather. But
control is not the only reason we use technologies in our lives.
When I ask my students the first day of class
what technology is, the replies usually are on the lines of tools to accomplish
tasks better, faster, or more efficiently. The emphasis is on work. When I tell them that pornography was one of
the first widespread uses of new communication technologies (ranging from
woodblock printing in the 16th century to the internet in the 20th
century), they pause. Their image, the
popular image of technology, is serious.
Steam engines are serious. Steamy
pictures are not. But both are part of
technology.
Astronauts and their Corvettes
How do historians study technologies? We use a combination of approaches including written and oral sources, but also we analyze the technologies themselves. Consider the Model T and a Corvette built a century later. The essential components and concepts – internal combustion engine, four wheels, enclosed cabin, &c. – remain the same, but much else has changed. Perhaps the most obvious difference is the height of the car body off the ground. Ford engineers designed the Model T for driving over low-quality roads or even no roads at all as well as easy maintenance by owners. Implicit in the Corvette is the assumption that it will be driven only on high-quality, smooth roads and maintained by professional mechanics.
History, the future, and Harry Truman’s one-armed economist. President Harry Truman
allegedly spoke wistfully about his desire for a one-armed economist. When asked why, the president responded that
his economic advisors would outline a proposed course of action, but then pause
and say, “But on the other hand ….”
Beware anyone who states “The lessons of history are ….” Reality is complicated and rarely can
historians fully and accurately comprehend the motivations and actions of all
the actors of a historical event. We can
– and should – participate in contemporary policy debates and use our
expertise, but we – and the people listening to our ideas – should be careful
of simplistic solutions. If the problem
was really that basic, it problem would have been solved long ago.
History of technology and public policy. Despite that warning, if
you want to use the history of technology to think about contemporary issues,
follow the economics and engineering.
Specifically, look who benefits and who loses from particular
technologies or policies (such as the Net Neutrality debate). Second, effective policies usually entail the
“three engineerings” of the environment, the actual technology, and the
users.
To take an example close to home, automobile
accidents killed over 53,000 Americans in 1970.
If accidents had continued at the same rate (deaths per hundred million
miles traveled), over 150,000 people would have died in 2013. Instead only 35,000 Americans died. If a friend or family member was one of those
35,000, that “only” is justifiably painful.
Three broad factors resulted in safer roads. First, the environment changed: rumble strips, crash barriers, and better road
design made driving safer while emergency medical services reduced the death
rate from crashes. Second, cars became
safer: airbags, crash-friendly
interiors, safety glass and other alternations made cars less lethal to their
occupants. Third, users changed: Driving while intoxicated became socially
unacceptable with increased legal penalties to enforce good behavior.
That nearly one hundred people die daily on
American roads shows there is still a significant problem (and a wonderful
example of how we misrepresent risk, a topic for a future blog). That five hundred people do not die daily on
those roads show how engineering the users, vehicles, and environment for
driving worked.
Who am I? I’m an academic, which means I’m defining
myself by my institution, teaching and research. I have the honor to teach at
Texas A&M University since 1988. I
teach unsuspecting (and sometimes suspecting) undergraduates and graduates classes
in the history of technology in America and worldwide, the history of energy of
America, and 20th-21st century European history. My latest book, FAXED. The Rise and Fall of the Fax Machine explores the history of
the fax machine. My first book, The Electrification of Russia examined
the evolution of electric power, lighting, and transportation in Russia from
the 1880s to the 1920s. I’ve also
written about pornography and technology, how Al Gore really did help invent
the Internet, and a few other odds and ends.
I hope this blog will spark your interest in the
history of technology. Please send me
suggestions for topics and approaches.
Next posting
Why failure is normal in the history of technology
[i]
Melvin Kranzberg and Carroll W. Pursell, Jr., Technology in Western Civilization (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967), I, 11.
[ii] Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor
Pinch, eds., “General Introduction,” in The
Social Construction of Technological Systems (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987), 4.