Blogs > Liberty and Power > Robert A. Heinlein

Jul 8, 2005

Robert A. Heinlein




RAH RAH RAH 98 Down, 2 to Centennial!
Robert Anson Heinlein (b.7/7/1907-d. 5/8/88) was known as the"Dean of Science Fiction Writers." Heinlein won four Hugos for best novel with Double Star (1956); Starship Troopers (1960); Stranger in a Strange Land (1962) and the libertarian classic, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, five years later.

Before writing SF, Heinlein attended the University of Missouri and the Naval Academy at Annapolis, graduating in 1929. He served five years in the Navy, retiring from active duty after contracting tuberculosis (illnesses would follow him throughout his life). After his Naval discharge (as a lieutenant), he studied physics and mathematics at UCLA.

His first story, "Life-Line", appeared in the August, 1939 edition of Astounding Science Fiction. Heinlein would write stories in large quantity, often using pseudonyms in order to prevent two stories from the"same" author being published in the same edition of a magazine.

Heinlein's work possessed three essentials: well-designed plots, vivid characters and good scientific arguments. He was scientifically precise, and he mixed hard and soft SF and fantasy in various doses, showing that he could create good stories in any area of speculative fiction.

During the WWII, Heinlein temporarily abandoned SF, working on research for high-altitude pressure suits (much like space suits) and radar at the Navy Experimental Air Station in Philadelphia.

Following the war's end, he devoted himself exclusively to writing. From 1948 to 1962 he wrote fourteen"juvenile" SF novels. The last of the Heinlein juveniles holds special interest; Podkayne of Mars (1962) shows a Venus colonized principally by Brazilians, a planet of capitalism carried to an extreme, where, in order to get anything, one has to grease a lot of palms.

Along with the juveniles, Heinlein wrote several adult novels during the 1950s that can be considered veritable gems of"Golden Age" of science fiction, such as The Puppet Masters (1951); Double Star (1956) and The Door into Summer (1957).

One of the juveniles, Space Cadet (1948) was made into a television series, shown between 1951 and 1956; while Rocketship Galileo (1947) served as inspiration for the film Destination Moon (1950), the first film to deal scientifically with the problems of space travel and which influenced many adolescents who would become--years later--the scientists and engineers of NASA. For this and other works, he was posthumously awarded the NASA Medal for Distinguished Public Service.

Stranger in a Strange Land (1961) was adopted by many in the 1960's as an integral part of the"flower" generation. With the incredible and unexpected success of Stranger in a Strange Land (it became the best-selling book in SF history), Heinlein had essentially a free hand to write whatever he wanted to.

He revisited his Future History universe and described the"lives" and loves of Lazarus Long (perhaps most prominent of cult-figure characters among Heinlein's fans) in Time Enough for Love (1973). He"invented" inter-universe travel and the concept of"World-as-Myth" (each fictional universe runs parallel to and is as real as our own, and our own universe is a fiction created by an author from another universe). These concepts allowed the meeting of characters from several of his books (universes) and from those of other authors in the novel Number of the Beast (1980). Heinlein analyzed these themes in his final The Cat Who Walks through Walls (1985) and To Sail beyond the Sunset (1987).

The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (1967), is considered his greatest libertarian work, with intelligent computers, an anarchist professor, Bernardo de la Paz (loosely based on Robert LeFevre), a revolution on the Moon, radical individualism and libertarian themes influenced many libertarians (myself included) in the 1960's-80's. TANSTAAFL, a term from The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, became a libertarian watchword--"There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch."

Just a thought.

Just Ken
CLASSical Liberalism



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Roderick T. Long - 7/9/2005

Also worth reading -- Poul Anderson's Polesotechnic League series, about a libertarian guild of space merchants, and its sequel the Flandry series, about the corruption and moral ambivalence of the empire that replaces the trade guild. The Polesotechnic League stories are more libertarian, but the Flandry stories are probably betetr written. Many are out of print; I wish someone would publish them in two big collections.


Kenneth R Gregg - 7/8/2005

Always enjoyed a good novel, and Storm-, er, Starship Troopers was one of a kind--also E.E. "Doc" Smith did riffs on the topic which were fun (go Lensman!).

I tended to incline toward "Bill The Galactic Hero" by Harry Harrison (his "Stainless Steel Rat" series wasn't too bad, either), Keith Laumer's "Reteif" books (far too honest about the profession of mendacity, er, diplomacy),Robert Sheckley's humor and Ted Sturgeon's short stories were more to my liking.

Haven't had much time to read fiction for some years, though, but I always enjoyed it.

Just a thought.
Just Ken
kgregglv@cox.net


Roderick T. Long - 7/8/2005

> "Political rights?" In this system, every
> person, including those in the non-citizen
> majority, has full rights to life, liberty
> and pursuit of happiness.

Yes, but they have those rights only at the sufferance of the ruling elite that controls the weapons and wields the reins of power. In real life the ruled wouldn't enjoy their rights for long.

> The "right" to particpate in politics is
> restricted to those who have given some
> demonstration that they are willing to place
> the public good above their own immediate
> self-interest.

First, I don't accept the idea of a conflict between self-interest and the public good. Any such conflict is going to be based on a mistaken conception of either self-interest or public good, and is going to function in practice as an ideological tool of subjugation.

Second, given that a military career is the path to political power, why should enlisting in the career be interpreted as a sign on public-spiritedness? It seems more likely that in such a society a military career would be most attractive to those whose interest in power is greater than their interest in peaceful commerce.

Third, the whole set-up reeks of the Platonic notion that military pursuits are more noble than commercial pursuits; in Spencer's terminology, it privileges the values of Militant Society over the values of Industrial Society. Since I agree with Spencer that the progress of civilisation lies with the displacement of Militant values by Industrial values, I can't work up much enthusiasm for Heinlein's neo-Republic.

I agree, of course -- as would Spencer, and the classical liberal tradition generally -- that a homo oeconomicus understanding of human motivation, one that pays no attention to cultural values, is going to be at a loss in understanding how societies work.


Charles N. Steele - 7/8/2005

Roderick, you misunderstand Heinlein's points (and mind you, I am an umpteenth readings authority!)

"Political rights?" In this system, every person, including those in the non-citizen majority, has full rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

The "right" to particpate in politics is restricted to those who have given some demonstration that they are willing to place the public good above their own immediate self-interest.

Heinlein didn't develop the ultimate blueprint for a social order in this tale, but he identifies a couple of very important things -- the necessity of balancing authority with responsibility, and the crucial role of the individual's ideals in shaping her/his behavior. Economists (at least those fixated entirely on the neoclassical homo economicus) have a difficult time understanding why some societies work and some don't -- reading this book might help.


Roderick T. Long - 7/8/2005

The irony, of course, is that Plato's Republic is explicitly referred to in Starship Troopers as a worthless model of society. I've always wondered whether that irony was deliberate or accidental on Heinlein's part.


Roderick T. Long - 7/8/2005

The social order in Starship Troopers is essentially an updating of Plato's Republic: a) a majority dedicated to commercial and economically productive pursuits, without political rights, b) a highly regimented class of young soldiers, and c) a ruling elite of elders drawn from those who survive military service.

I didn't like it in Plato, and I don't like it in Heinlein.


Jonathan Dresner - 7/8/2005

Heinlein's work was actually remarkably consistent, I think. Some of his later works -- Friday and, to a lesser extent, Job -- are both great reads and intellectually substantial works. There weren't, in the 1960s, lots of people writing juvenalia of that quality, either.


Charles N. Steele - 7/7/2005

Thanks for the note on Heinlein. I was already a libertarian when I first started reading him, and loved him then and still do. I just finished "Starship Troopers" for the umpteenth time -- each time I read it I'm more convinced that he understood what makes a political system sustainable than most economists do.


Roderick T. Long - 7/7/2005

I think his work was uneven; I find his handling of female characters intensely annoying, his early pro-militarism tiresome, and his later longer novels rather self-indulgent (exciting beginnings -- sprawling/rambling middles -- then endings that trail off rather than conclude). All the same, I count myself a Heinlein fan and I think I've read all or nearly all of his works. Some of my favourites are the short stories in The Past Through Tomorrow, which I fear may be out of print.


Kenneth R Gregg - 7/7/2005

Heinlein was years ahead of almost every prognosticator. Read his "Waldo" sometime on the use of mechanical/human appliances.

Just a thought.
Just Ken


Kenneth R Gregg - 7/7/2005

I liked very few of Heinlein's longer works, save for "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress". I think his talents were best expressed in his juvies, which are quite clean thematically and provide memorable characters. I've known many women who liked his female lead characters.

And yes, "Farnham's Freehold" would make a good movie.

Just a thought.
Just Ken


Roderick T. Long - 7/7/2005

In Heinlein's novel I Will Fear No Evil (p. 151 of my edition), one of the characters asks: "this machine ... has access to the Congressional Library St. Louis Annex, does it not?" and receives the answer: "Certainly. Hooked into the Interlibrary Net, rather, though you can restrict a query to one library."

The book was published in 1970.


David Timothy Beito - 7/7/2005

Well done. When I first read Stranger in a Strange Land when I was high school, I didn't particularly care for it....probably for the same reason I didn't like E.T or Siddhartha by Hermann Hesse. When I read it then, it sturck me as pretentious. Perhaps I would feel different now.

Soon, thereafter, I read Farham's Freehold and loved it. I always thought that it would make a fine movie.