Blogs > Cliopatria > Not Much Interested in Deep Throat?

Jun 2, 2005

Not Much Interested in Deep Throat?




I’m not convinced about W. Mark Felt as Deep throat. I believe that he was a confidential source for Woodward and Bernstein. I believe that he thinks that he was Deep Throat. I imagine that the Post. believes it. But I am not convinced that we've heard the last of this story. And I am not at all surprised to find out that Joan Hoff is not convinced either.

When Professor Hoff was at Ohio University I took a graduate seminar from her that focused solely on Watergate. Hoff is a bit of a contararian and has been skeptical of just about everything that passes for common wisdom on Watergate. In the class we traced the history of the event and did as much investigation as was possible from Athens, Ohio. Obviously as a huge part of that work, we looked into Deep Throat. And I have never forgotten Professor Hoff talking about something that astounded me, and which she mentions in her article: The proposal for All the President’s Men apparently had no mention of Deep Throat, or of any one mysterious interloper who filled in the missing pieces as the story progressed. Their agent asked some questions. Lightbulbs went on. Suddenly and coincidentally the two intrepid reporters either found or remembered Hal Holbrooke standing hidden by shadows in parking garages.

Hoff admits that we do not know the chronology of Deep Throat’s emergence, but it would not surprise me if he (or she) is not yet either a figment of their imaginations or, as has long been suspected, a composite. I would guess that this story will play out further in the weeks to come. Apparently Woodward and Bernstein are fessing up. I remain unconvinced. At some point someone else is going to come forward and say, “Wait a minute, I gave some information on the down low as well. Where is my fifteen minutes?” And on top of this, there are many figures for whom being seen as Deep throat would be catastrophic. Perhaps upon their deaths we’ll find out that they too provided information attributed to the character named after Linda Lovelace in the eponymous porn film.

Truth be told, there is an enormous part of me that does not care. It is an inconvenient fact of history that Woodward and Bernstein opened the story but got most of it wrong. Go and read ATPM again. Then go find one of the many histories of Watergate, such as Stanley Kutler’s work, and compare. Woodward and Bernstein did some fine (if at times questionable) investigative journalism to get the ball rolling, but their story of Watergate was not really the story of Watergate. Theirs was largely about something as prosaic as money. The real story went far deeper and had substantially more significance. This being the case, Deep Throat is not really all that important; certainly not as much so as the mystery surrounding it has made it seem. And it has been in the interest of Bernstein, and especially Woodward (a glory whore who has never met an anonymous source who could not further his career, facts and evidentiary standards be damned) for Deep Throat to remain a shadowy figure, enshrouded in danger and romance and cigarette smoke. If he has revealed himself in the form of Felt, and if that really is the end of the story, then fine. A piece of the puzzle has emerged, but despite the seemingly central location of that piece, we already knew what the picture looked like.



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Maarja Krusten - 6/3/2005

For a different perspective on whistleblowing and ethical quandaries facing federal officials, see the comment I posted on the main page at
http://hnn.us/readcomment.php?id=61999#61999


Derek Charles Catsam - 6/2/2005

Greg --
Ironically enough, the whole point of Nixon reconsidered (and my biggest problem with it) is that it tries to reassess Nixon by effectively ignoring Watergate. I understand why she did this, and what is interesting is that its legacy will probably be the work it spawns rather than the book itself, and in so doing, it provides an enormous service (I am thinking of her student Dean Kotlowski's quite fine book on Nixon and Civil Rights). But Nixon without Watergate is a bit tough to pull off. Nonetheless, that was a really interesting seminar, both the only one of its type and the most focused that I ever took in graduate school.

dc


Greg Robinson - 6/2/2005

Good comments, Derek. I've told numerous people that knew I did some undergrad work on Nixon that I really don't care all that much about who Deep Throat was or is. It's just a footnote to the larger story and knowing (or not knowing) who it may or may not have been is largely irrelevant. I like Joan Hoff's work on Nixon also, particularly "Nixon Reconsidered".