comments powered by Disqus
More Comments:
Aeon J. Skoble - 10/15/2009
Whoops, sorry about that. Since ownership changed hands, I've been unsure of your status so you've slipped off my radar. No offense intended!
Laissez Faire Books - 10/14/2009
It is available at Laissez Faire Books as well, and at a cheaper price. Why do libertarians just ignore one of their own? www.lfb.org
David T. Beito - 10/14/2009
I wonder if part of the blame can be laid to Rand's interference on the set. Vidor was an excellent director but the final product seems unusually melodramatic, even by the standards of the time, or even his other films.
Aeon J. Skoble - 10/14/2009
Erika Holzer disagrees, but I don't have a dog in that fight. It's a cool story even if Bradford was right, and in either case, the film is a gem. But thanks for noting the Liberty article, which I also have in print filed away somewhere.
Russell Hanneken - 10/14/2009
R. W. Bradford did some investigation and decided the film was probably never banned by the Fascists. See here:
http://libertyunbound.com/article.php?id=260
Aeon J. Skoble - 10/14/2009
That Jan 89 article in Reason is not among their archive of online articles. But it's worth a read. If any Reason staffers are reading this, why not put it up? I still have my print copy, of course.
Aeon J. Skoble - 10/14/2009
Like David, I like the film of The Fountainhead more than most people do, but it does have its flaws. The film of We The Living is just terrific. The book and the film are highly underrated components of the Rand world.
David T. Beito - 10/14/2009
Given the fact that it was wartime Italy, the production values were lavish. This is a grade A film even by Hollywood standards. Although I have s sentimental attachment to the Fountainhead film (which has a certain memorable beauty), We Living holds up much better today.
Amy H. Sturgis - 10/14/2009
About time indeed! Good news.