Blogs > Liberty and Power > George W. Bush: Agent for Islamic Fundamentalism?

Mar 10, 2005

George W. Bush: Agent for Islamic Fundamentalism?




If Murray Rothbard, with his penchant for sensing conspiracies, was still alive, perhaps we might have seen it earlier!

Today, the New York Times reports that the Bush Administration, in"a sharp policy reversal," in the face of Hezbollah's power in Lebanon, is now ready to accept the notion of that organization having a leading role in that nation's future.

In Iraq, it is evident that the January elections have resulted in a great increase in the power of the Shia fundamentalists there. If Mubarek holds a really democratic election in Egypt, the fundamentalists will increase their power there also.

Hezbollah's emerging power is apt to affect events in Palestine as well, while the situation in both Afghanistan and Pakistan, is far from settled. In the hills, off from the flourishing poppy fields, Osama bin Ladin still makes his tapes to broadcast to the world. Not to mention Iran.

Bush proclaims all of the above as a great victory, but it would appear that the net result, thus far, of American interventionism, has been to all but destroy the secular states once emerging in the Middle East.

One might argue that the Neocons around the President simply sold him a bill of goods about ruling the world, but Murray always said, go for the most parsimonious explanation!

Maybe, when George"found" God, who helped him stop drinking, it was Allah, rather than the Christian God. After all, Jesus was always doing his thing with wine and miracles, while it is Islam that is into real abstention.

In explaining the development of America, Mark Twain once noted that it was whiskey that initiated our westward expansion, or, as he remarked,"Westward the Jug of Empire makes its way."

As George W. reverses that trend, and takes teetotalism eastward, the tourist mecca of Islamic Dubai had better watch out. In that den of iniquity the hotels and bars feature at least a half dozen kinds of German beer on draft, let alone the hard stuff. Besides, a city that size may just be the place where the American Army can successfully wage Fourth Generation Warfare, and sustain Democracy, Law, Order and Stability.

Or, as Twain might have put it,"Eastward the Holy Grail of Empire makes its way."


comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Irfan Khawaja - 8/4/2006

If elections are now bringing fundamentalists to the fore in the countries you mention, what exactly is the evidence that "secular states" were "emerging" in the Middle East or South Asia before the Bush presidency? If elections bring fundamentalists to power, that means that the majority populations of the relevant states were fundamentalist to begin with. If so, the only "secular states" that were "emerging" before the Bush presidency were the ones that were suppressing the wishes of their majority populations by force.

So is it your position that "secularism" comes into existence by the application of brute force? If so, I'm curious how you differentiate your view from the one espoused by Bush. Or do you mean instead that the holding of elections ITSELF turns people into fundamentalists? In which case I'd be curious how that happens.

"Most parsimonious explanation", I might add, is a somewhat equivocal phrase. Some explanations are parsimonious in the sense that they use very little to explain a lot. But some are parsimonious in the sense that they use very little...to explain even less. I'd say your "explanation" falls squarely into the latter category.


Roderick T. Long - 3/14/2005

Hmm, on foreign policy matters I think of SOLO as being more "hard-line" than TOC.

Anyway, Peikoff of ARI supported Kerry against Bush. Go figure.


Max Swing - 3/10/2005

I have visited several Objectivist playing-fields in the last month and I think, Mr. Marina, you have an excellent point in regard to their abstruse "interpretations".
Given the latest poll at Solohq.com, where the majority of those open-minded Objectivists voted for Bush being a friend of Liberty, I don't want to know what the hardliners like ARI or TOC think about Bush.


Jason Pappas - 3/10/2005

Daniel Pipes has been saying the same thing for some time now. Here’s his latest: http://www.danielpipes.org/article/2447

However, I suspect you are on to something. Here’s an article from a conservative who doesn’t find the prospect of a fundamentalist regime so bad:
http://www.techcentralstation.com/030805A.html

I expect Bush to embrace these “faith-based democracies” in the Middle-East.