Blogs > Liberty and Power > Why the Worst Get on Top and Get Worse

Mar 3, 2005

Why the Worst Get on Top and Get Worse




Richard Cohen's space in the Post today is a mediocre column wrapped around a terrific quote.

"It is difficult for men in high office to avoid the malady of self-delusion," Coolidge wrote."They are always surrounded by worshipers. They are constantly, and for the most part sincerely, assured of their greatness. They live in an artificial atmosphere of adulation and exaltation which sooner or later impairs their judgment."

Longer excerpt here:

Coolidge made remarks around this time, which would benefit anyone holding high office to consider...."It is also difficult for men in high office to avoid the malady of self-delusion. They are surrounded by worshippers... They live in an artificial atmosphere of adulation and exaltation, which sooner or later impairs their judgment. They are in grave danger of becoming arrogant or careless... the chances of having wise and faithful public service are increased by a change in presidential office after a moderate length of time... It's also a pretty good idea to get out when they still want you."

The system we've got for determining control over nuclear weapons and history's most powerful military already pre-selects for odd characters. Few of us would want to spend two or more years riding a bus around Iowa mouthing platitudes to people we've never met, and scrupulously self-censoring to avoid"gaffes," which Michael Kinsley famously defined as when a politician accidently tells the truth. Even fewer of us are so suffused with a sense of our own grandeur that we'd feel up to the job. I remember my first visit to Little Rock, Arkansas, which is distinctly less impressive than Red Bank, New Jersey, near where I grew up. Bill Clinton imagining he could be president struck me as about as outlandish as the mayor of Red Bank thinking he could be"Leader of the Free World."

If and when that sort of insane ambition actually pays off, and you win the presidency, it would be hard to avoid thinking you'd been touched by God, even if you aren't religious. Add to that the social environment the president moves in, where he's surrounded by people who treat him like a god and insulated from people who'll tell him he's full of crap. (It's probably worse if you don't read newspapers and the Secret Service cordons off protestors beyond your line of sight). I wrote more about this here, with just as little insight into what can be done about it.



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Sudha Shenoy - 3/6/2005

Just to finish (my computer got the better of me): Prime Ministers - arrogant as they are - are never quite so puffed up with self-importance. That's because they have to bow their head to someone. Your American President is supreme.


Sudha Shenoy - 3/6/2005

This is why absolute monarchs always had court jesters - 'many a true word is spoken in jest.' When Roman emperors rode in their chariots in a victory parade, they had a slave at their shoulder murmuring into their ear, 'You too are mortal.' These democratically-elected autocrats have a unique arrogance. What is needed is a popular skepticism of politics.


Sheldon Richman - 3/4/2005

I think the column is better than mediocre. Maybe that's because it makes a point I like to make: the unique danger of presidential power in foreign policy. If President Bush were to say that we must adopt his Social Security plan because he has classified information showing an imminent fiscal threat--information he can't share with the public--he'd be a laughing-stock. Yet he can do something similar in foreign affairs and get away with it. All the more reason for special restrictions on a president's freedom of action in the foreign arena.


William Marina - 3/4/2005

While the Party system under the Bosses was no great shakes, it was still better than the silly primaries where "winning" in Iowa and New Hampshire casts the whole direction of the campaign, plus the "structured" debates on television which are big nothings compared to Lincoln/Douglas.

We do have a system befitting an Empire, where with a decent set of advisors, a horse such as Caligula's might not do such a bad job. The horse might, after all, do a better job of having an instinctive sense of selecting at least really "compassionate" ones.