Patrick Buchanan as Deep Throat? Why It's Not Such a Mystery After All
Most Americans believe that Deep Throat was a national hero. Many have been puzzled that he hasn't identified himself and basked in the glory. But that could be because his motivations were complex.
Following a painstaking three-year investigation, University of Illinois Professor William Gaines's 40 students recently voted unanimously that they believe Patrick Buchanan was Deep Throat. But while they established that Buchanan had the opportunity and the means to play the role of White House whistleblower, they did not provide a motive. I think he had one, though few are aware of it.
On the surface, Buchanan had every reason to stick by Nixon. Like Nixon, he
believed in playing politics rough. In April 1972, Buchanan was in charge of
"opposition research" in the Nixon White House. In an April 10, 1972
memo, Buchanan urged the Nixon White House to mount covert operations to harass
and embarrass Democratic rivals and laid out his ideas to accomplish this. "Buchanan
and his top aides recommended staging counterfeit attacks by one Democrat upon
another, messing up scheduled events, arranging demonstrations and spreading
rumors to plague the Democrats," reported the Washington Post in
a March 4, 1996 story.
Also like Nixon, Buchanan concealed his activities from investigators, flatly
denying in sworn testimony before the Watergate Committee in 1973 that he was
aware of any "covert operations" Republicans had sponsored for the
1972 Democratic National Convention.
Yet when Bob Woodward appeared on CNN's Larry King Live on February 13, 1996, he reported that Buchanan believed early on that Nixon must resign and was very active in his removal. How could that be? A clue to the mystery lies in Buchanan's ultraconservative Catholic outlook.
BUCHANAN AND THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
In an interview appearing in the August 28, 1988 issue of Our Sunday Visitor,
Buchanan responded to the question, "What kind of Catholic are you?"
by saying, "A believing Catholic, a practicing Catholic and a papist. I
think John Paul II is a singular leader of our time
.. he speaks out with
a sense of authority and moral courage. I think he's a genuinely great man,
really a gift of God to the Church. And in virtually all the quarrels in which
he's engaged, I'm on his side."
In 1964, Pope Paul VI created the Papal
Commission on Population and Birth Control. It was divided into two groups,
one consisting of 64 lay persons, the other, of 15 cardinals and bishops, among
them Karol Wojtyla the future Pope John Paul II, then a Polish cardinal. Pope
Paul charged them with only one mission - to determine how the Church could
change its position on birth control without undermining papal authority. After
two years of study, the Commission concluded in 1966 that it was not possible
to make this change without undermining papal authority, but that the Church
should do so in any case because it was the right thing to do! The lay members
voted 60 to 4 for change, and the cardinals and bishops, 9 to 6 for change.
A minority report was co-authored by Karol Wojtyla who is now Pope John Paul
II. In this and other texts, the future pope convincingly argued that a change
on the birth control issue would destroy the principle of papal
infallibility and that infallibility was the fundamental principle of the
Church upon which all else rests. A change on birth control would immediately
raise questions about other possible errors popes have made in matters of divorce,
homosexuality, priestly celibacy, confession, parochial schooling, etc. that
are fundamental to Roman Catholicism. In 1968, Paul VI accepted the view of
the minority report and issued Humanae Vitae, which banned birth control
for all time.
What does the Church's position on birth control have to do with Richard Nixon?
On July 18, 1969, Nixon sent to Congress his "Special
Message on Problems of Population Growth." Special Messages to the
Congress are exceedingly rare and this was the first such message on population.
For the first time, the United States was committed to confronting the population
problem. And in an equally rare action, this message was approved by the Congress.
Its passage was bipartisan, indicating broad political support for American
political action to combat the problem of overpopulation. The message was a
watershed development, though few recall it.
The most important element of the Special Message was its creation of the Commission
on Population Growth and the American Future. During the signing of the measure
establishing the commission on March 16, 1970, Nixon commented: "I believe
this is an historic occasion. It has been made historic not simply by the act
of the President in signing this measure, but by the fact that it has had bipartisan
support and also such broad support in the Nation."
The 24-member Commission was chaired by John D. Rockefeller 3rd. It ordered
more than 100 research projects, which collected and analyzed data that would
make possible the formulation of a comprehensive U.S. population policy. After
two years of intensive deliberations, the Commission completed a 186-page report,
Population
and the American Future, which offered more than 70
recommendations. The recommendations were a bold but sane response to the
challenges we faced in 1972. For example, they called for:
· passage of a population Education Act to help school systems establish
well-planned education programs;
· sex education to be widely available, especially through the schools;
· passage of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA);
· contraception to be available for all, including minors, at government
expense if need be;
· abortion for all who want it, at government expense if necessary;
· vastly expanded research in many areas related to population growth
control;
· and the elimination of all employment of illegal aliens.
On May 5, 1972, at a ceremony held to formally submit the Commission's findings
and conclusions, President Nixon publicly renounced the report. This was six
months before he faced re-election and he was feeling intense political heat
from the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church. Under Vatican leadership, the
American bishops intervened. Nixon was convinced by his advisors that he could
not confront the bishops on this issue and win reelection in the fall of 1972.
In his book, Catholic Bishops
in American Politics, Timothy Byrnes, states, "[Nixon] communicated
that disavowal in an equally public letter to Cardinal Terence Cooke, a leading
spokesman for the bishops' opposition to abortion...The Catholic vote was especially
important to Nixon and his publicists in 1972."
None of the more than three-score recommendations that collectively would have
created a comprehensive U.S. population policy was ever implemented. Not one
was ever adopted. To this day, the United States has no population policy.
In May 1973, Ambassador Adolph Schmidt asked his friend, Rockefeller, what had
gone wrong? Rockefeller
responded: "The greatest difficulty has been the very active opposition
by the Roman Catholic Church through its various agencies in the United States."
In 1992, one Commission member, Congressman James Scheuer (D.-NY), spoke out
publicly for the first time on the matter: "Our exuberance was short-lived.
Then-President Richard Nixon promptly ignored our final report. The reasons
were obvious - fear of attacks from the far right and from the Roman Catholic
Church because of our positions on family planning and abortion. With the benefit
of hindsight, it is now clear that this obstruction was but the first of many
similar actions to come from high places."
Curiously, despite his opposition to the first report on population, on April
24, 1974, Nixon again acted boldly by ordering another population-security study
be undertaken-National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200)--one perhaps
even more threatening to the survival of the Papacy than the first one. Nixon
must have known that he would encounter the same implacable Vatican hostility
to this report that he had experienced to the Rockefeller Report. Yet he went
ahead anyway--perhaps because by then he felt he had little to lose.
NSSM 200 was the most significant act Nixon undertook with regard to the population
crisis. Nixon directed that a comprehensive new study be undertaken to determine
the "Implications of World Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas
Interests." The report of this study would become one of the most important
documents on world population growth ever written. In the 2-page memo, National
Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, acting for the President, directed the secretaries
of Defense and Agriculture, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency,
the deputy secretary of state, and the administrator of the Agency for International
Development, to undertake the population study jointly.
On August 9, 1974, Gerald Ford succeeded to the Presidency. Revisions of the
study continued until July, 1975. On November 26, 1975, the 227-page
report and its recommendations were endorsed by President Ford in National
Security Decision Memorandum 314: "The President has reviewed the interagency
response to NSSM 200...," wrote the new National Security Advisor, Brent
Scowcroft. "He believes that United States leadership is essential to combat
population growth, to implement the World Population Plan of Action and to advance
United States security and overseas interests. The President endorses the policy
recommendations contained in the Executive Summary of the NSSM 200 response..."
The intense concern of the authors of the NSSM 200 report is clearly evident.
NSSM 200 reports: "There is a major risk of severe damage [from continuing
rapid population growth] to world economic, political, and ecological systems
and, as these systems begin to fail, to our humanitarian values." "World
population growth is widely recognized within the Government as a current danger
of the highest magnitude calling for urgent measures." "It is of the
utmost urgency that governments now recognize the facts and implications of
population growth, determine the ultimate population sizes that make sense for
their countries and start vigorous programs at once to achieve their desired
goals."
NSSM 200 made the following recommendations, to mention a few:
· The United States would provide world leadership in population growth
control.
· The United States would seek to attain its own population stability
by the year 2000. This would have required a one-child family policy for this
country, thanks to the phenomenon of demographic momentum, a requirement the
authors well understood.
· Recognize goals for the United States: making family planning information,
education and means available to all people of the developing world by 1980,
and achieving a 2-child family in the developing countries by 2000.
· The United States would provide substantial funds to help achieve these
goals.
But, as with the Rockefeller Commission Report, the implementation of recommendations
made in NSSM 200 - approved by President Ford, and so communicated to all relevant
Departments and Agencies in our government - was halted mainly through the influence
of the same opposition that had precluded adoption of the Rockefeller Commission
recommendations. None of them was ever implemented.
Had the recommendations of NSSM 200 been implemented in 1975, the world would
be very different today. The adoption of the World
Population Plan of Action by consensus of the 137 countries represented
at the United Nations World Population Conference at Bucharest in August 1974
(the first such conference) had set the stage for dealing with this gravely
serious problem. According to the authors of the NSSM 200 Report, only the Vatican
objected to the plan. At that moment, the 137 governments of the countries present
were ready to act. With U.S. leadership and resources, the plan could have been
successfully implemented. The NSSM 200 Report predicted that the prospects would
have been improved for every nation and people to be significantly more secure.
There would have been less civil and regional warfare, less starvation and hunger,
a cleaner environment and less disease, greater educational opportunities, expanded
civil rights, especially for women, and a political climate more conducive to
the expansion of democracy. Now there are 3 billion more of us
Knowing this history, is it any wonder that Patrick Buchanan came to the conclusion,
as Woodward revealed on Larry King Live, that Nixon had to go? Both the Rockefeller
Commission study and the NSSM 200 study threatened the Papacy by putting the
Pope on a collision course with civil authorities. As Nixon set about leading
the nations of the world to provide contraception and birth control to every
sexually active person on the planet, and at the same time providing the moral
grounds for their use, it is not hard to understand why Buchanan, his erstwhile
apologist, might have concluded that Nixon posed a serious threat to Catholic
orthodoxy-and to the Catholic Church itself.
Patrick Buchanan was certainly motivated to drive Nixon from the Presidency.
Buchanan's writings are everywhere. He is sufficiently brazen and arrogant and
has the passion and commitment to his church and Pope John Paul II, as he described
in the interview in Our Sunday Visitor, to undertake the "Deep Throat"
role. His ultraconservative Catholic views are widely known. His presidential
campaign fund raising letters read as if they were written by the Pope. He referred
to abortion as the slaughter of children and murder. He called for the passage
of a human life amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the penultimate political
goal of the U.S. bishops and the Vatican. He even said he was at war :
"I believe we are engaged in a war - a battle for the lives of the unborn.
It is a cultural and religious war, and America's soul is at stake. . . How
do we win this war? We start with a pro-life President. We need a President
with conviction who will never compromise, barter, or negotiate on the issue
of life."
Richard Nixon was not such a President. In fact, his Rockefeller Commission
and NSSM 200 study recommendations, if implemented, would have given great legitimacy
to the widespread use of abortion and would have helped the very forces Buchanan
subsequently declared war on. Just as Woodward reported on Larry King Live,
Buchanan recognized early on that Nixon must go and was very much an activist
in his removal - but for reasons very different from those professed to Woodward.
Hence, this history reveals that Patrick Buchanan's commitment to his religious
beliefs may have played a key role in the removal of President Nixon.