With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

Robert J. Samuelson: Almost all the errors of the 1930s were rooted in the economic orthodoxies of the time. Could the same be true today?

[Samuelson began his journalism career in 1969 as a reporter for the Post. He left the Post in 1973 and was a freelance writer for almost four years before joining the National Journal magazine as its economics correspondent in late 1976.]

The Great Depression of the 1930s was the most momentous economic event of the 20th century. It was a proximate cause of World War II, having fed the Nazis' rise in Germany. It inspired a new American welfare system as a response to mass misery. Everywhere, it discredited unsupervised capitalism. Given today's economic crisis, our renewed fascination with the Depression is natural. But we ought to be cautious in stretching the parallels too far.

It's worth recalling how exceptional the Depression was. As Liaquat Ahamed writes in his engrossing"Lords of Finance":

"During a three-year period, real GDP [gross domestic product] in the major economies fell by over 25 percent, a quarter of the adult male population was thrown out of work … The economic turmoil created hardships in every corner of the globe, from the prairies of Canada to the teeming cities of Asia."

In this well-researched and elegantly written book, Ahamed—a professional money manager—attributes the Depression to two central causes: the misguided restoration of the gold standard in the 1920s and the massive intergovernmental debts, including German reparations, resulting from World War I.

Up to a point, his narrative builds upon the previous scholarship of economists Milton Friedman, Anna Schwartz, Charles Kindleberger, Barry Eichengreen and Peter Temin. But where Ahamed excels is in evoking the political, social and personal forces that led to disastrous economic decisions. His title refers to the four men who heavily engineered the era's perverse policies: Montagu Norman, governor of the Bank of England; Benjamin Strong, head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank; Émile Moreau, head of the Banque de France; and Hjalmar Schacht, head of Germany's Reichsbank.

Determined to reinstate the gold standard—seen as a precondition of global prosperity—they cooperated and quarreled. But"all the thought and work and good intentions," as Norman wrote years later,"achieved absolutely nothing." Just the opposite: they set the world on the path to ruin....

Sadly, this tragedy has modern parallels. As in the 1930s, a worldwide credit collapse is a danger. Global stock, bond and bank markets are interwoven. Losses in one may prompt pullbacks in others. Money flows to 28 emerging-market countries in 2009 will drop 80 percent from 2007 levels, estimates the Institute of International Finance. There are currency misalignments that, as in the 1920s, have distorted trade. China's renminbi is wildly undervalued. Indeed, global industrial production and trade are falling faster now than early in the Depression, report economists Eichengreen of the University of California, Berkeley, and Kevin H. O'Rourke of Trinity College Dublin.

Still, striking differences separate now from then. The biggest is the response of governments, which—unencumbered by the gold standard—have eased credit, propped up financial institutions and increased spending to arrest an economic free fall....

Read entire article at Newsweek