With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

Jim Downs: History's part in the Democratic nomination

[Jim Downs is Assistant Professor of History, Connecticut College.]

In a crowded black church in Southern California in February 2008, President Bill Clinton announced, ‘I waited my whole life to vote for an African American for president. I waited my whole life to vote for a woman for president. And sometimes I look up at sky and say God you’re playing with my mind again.’ God may not be playing a trick on Clinton’s mind, but history seems to be.
Throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, African Americans’ and women’s campaigns for equality often unfolded simultaneously, often relied on one another for support, and often resulted in asking who would be first to earn political recognition. That the 2008 Democratic presidential nominee will either be a woman or an African American is rooted in a history that can be traced to the decades leading up to the Civil War, when the movements for African Americans’ and for women’s equality both emerged.

These movements, in turn, grew out of a still larger reform impulse that swept through the industrializing towns and cities of the eastern seaboard of the United States. Itinerant ministers implored mostly middle-class women to join their crusade against the immorality they saw as present in these communities. The spirited mantra that undergirded their mission, boldly stating that individuals possessed the power to transform their environment and alter their lives, impelled these women to...
Read entire article at History Today